PC-BA-FBA-20 Sample Questions Answers

The true statements about formal observation are b and d. Formal observation is when a business analyst watches an individual or group perform their work. Statement (b) is true as observing the environment directly helps the analyst understand the physical business environment and how it influences the work. Statement (d) is true because observation is particularly effective for identifying tacit knowledge (unspoken or unwritten rules, shortcuts, or skills) that the worker may take for granted or find difficult to articulate during an interview. Statement (a) is false as observation is a passive technique, not suitable for actively negotiating or resolving conflicts, which is better suited for workshops or interviews. Statement (c) is false as observation does not actively engage a wide range of stakeholders to obtain buy-in.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Investigative Techniques, Observation)

Traceability links requirements to other project artefacts. There are two main types: horizontal and vertical. Horizontal traceability (Option A) links a requirement forward to its design, code, and test cases, and backward to its source (Option D), tracing its lifecycle from inception to delivery. Vertical traceability concerns tracing a requirement up or down the requirements hierarchy (C). This ensures that lower-level requirements (e.g., functional) are aligned with and fully support the higher-level business objectives, policies, and strategy. For example, it traces a solution requirement up to the business requirement it satisfies, validating that every low-level detail is necessary and justified by a high-level business need.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Requirements Traceability)

The Business Change Lifecycle encompasses multiple stages, including alignment, analysis, design, implementation, and realisation. The role of a business analyst (BA) is versatile and can span across all these stages, depending on the project's needs.

Key Considerations:

Involvement Across All Stages: A business analyst can contribute to every stage of the lifecycle, from identifying business needs during alignment to ensuring benefits realization post-implementation.

Implementation Focus: While BAs are often heavily involved in implementation, their role is not limited to this stage.

Realisation Stage: BAs may also be involved in the realisation stage to validate that the intended benefits have been achieved.

Alignment Stage: Business analysis plays a critical role in aligning project objectives with organizational goals.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. A business analyst can be involved at every stage in the lifecycle:This is true; BAs can contribute across all stages of the lifecycle.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. The business analyst is involved more heavily during the implementation stage of the lifecycle than any other stage:While BAs are often active during implementation, their involvement is not restricted to this stage.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. The business analyst would not be involved in the realisation stage of the lifecycle:BAs can play a role in validating benefits realization, so this statement is false.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Business analysis does not take place in the alignment stage of a business change:Alignment involves understanding business needs and objectives, which is a core BA responsibility.Conclusion: This is not correct .

A formal Requirements Validation Review (or walkthrough/inspection) is conducted to ensure the requirements are correct, complete, and meet the business need before sign-off. The review group typically includes the Business Owner (A) to ensure correctness, the Solution Architect (C) and Developers to check technical feasibility, and the Tester (D) to ensure testability. The Project Manager (B) is usually the facilitator or organiser of the review process and is responsible for project delivery, but they are NOT usually a technical reviewer of the document content itself, as their direct involvement could compromise the impartiality of the review, which is focused on quality assurance, not project schedule.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Requirements Validation Techniques)

A RACI chart (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) is a tool used to clarify roles and responsibilities in a project or process. Each role in the chart has a specific meaning:

Key Definitions:

Responsible: The person or role responsible for performing the task or completing the work.

Accountable: The person ultimately answerable for the task's completion and outcomes.

Consulted: Individuals or roles who provide input or expertise before decisions are made or tasks are completed.

Informed: Individuals or roles who need to be kept updated on progress or outcomes.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Responsible:The "Responsible" role is assigned to the person or team performing the task.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Accountable:The "Accountable" role ensures the task is completed but does not necessarily perform the task.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Consulted:The "Consulted" role provides input or advice but does not perform the task.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Informed:The "Informed" role receives updates but is not involved in task execution.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The category assigned to the role or person performing the task is:

A. Responsible.

One of the core principles of business analysis is the continuous need for negotiation and consensus building, particularly when dealing with conflicting stakeholder perspectives and requirements. Business analysis actively seeks to negotiate and resolve these conflicts rather than avoiding them, which is a key part of establishing a shared understanding of the problem and the proposed solution. The other options contradict established BA principles: the principle is to find root causes, not symptoms (leading to superficial and ineffective solutions); to investigate and evaluate multiple options, not just solutions (ensuring the optimal change is selected); and to focus on business improvement as the driver for any necessary IT system change, not the other way around. The BA role necessitates working across competing interests to reach a successful outcome, making negotiation a fundamental principle.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Principles of Business Analysis / Analysing and Managing Stakeholders)

 A mission statement defines the organization's purpose and primary objectives, often focusing on what the organization does and how it operates in the present. In contrast, a vision statement outlines the long-term aspirations of the organization—what it aims to become in the future. The mission provided—"To meet or undercut all our competitors' prices"—is focused on price competitiveness, which is a tactical approach rather than a strategic aspiration.

Let’s analyze each option:

A. To offer the best value office fitting service: While this aligns somewhat with the mission, it is more of a value proposition or operational goal rather than a visionary statement. It lacks the aspirational and long-term focus that defines a vision.

B. To reduce the cost of office fitting by 5%: This is a specific, measurable objective, but it is too narrow and tactical to qualify as a vision. Visions are broader and not tied to specific metrics.

C. To increase the company's market share: Increasing market share is a strategic goal, but it is still an intermediate step toward achieving something greater. It does not capture the overarching ambition of the company.

D. To be the premier office fitting company: This option reflects a long-term aspiration and aligns with the characteristics of a vision statement. It expresses the desire to achieve leadership and excellence in the industry, which is consistent with the mission of being competitive on price while aiming for a higher status.

According to the BCS Business Analysis Framework , a vision statement should inspire and guide the organization toward its ultimate goal. Therefore, D is the most appropriate choice.

The true statements about workshops are b and c. Workshops are collaborative, structured meetings involving multiple stakeholders. Statement (b) is true because having multiple stakeholders present allows the facilitator (often the BA) to immediately cross-check and resolve conflicting information or assumptions in real-time. Statement (c) is true because the group environment, led by a skilled facilitator, is highly effective for discussing differing viewpoints and working towards a consensus or agreed-upon outcome. Statement (a) is false as this describes formal observation, not a workshop. Statement (d) is false; workshops are primarily used to gather qualitative information (opinions, requirements, process logic), not to collect accurate quantitative data (e.g., process timings or volumes), which is usually obtained from documents or system logs.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Investigative Techniques, Workshops)

The Waterfall methodology is a linear approach where requirements are defined upfront, and changes are difficult to accommodate once the project begins. Agile methodology , on the other hand, emphasizes flexibility and adaptability to changing requirements.

Key Considerations:

Inherent Uncertainty in Cost: While cost uncertainty exists in both methodologies, Agile does not specifically address this drawback of Waterfall.

Inflexibility to Changing Requirements: Waterfall's rigid structure makes it difficult to incorporate changes once the project starts. Agile addresses this by allowing iterative development and continuous feedback.

Capturing All Requirements Upfront: Agile does not aim to capture all requirements upfront; instead, it embraces evolving requirements throughout the project.

Stakeholder Agreement on Scope Before Work Begins: Agile encourages ongoing collaboration with stakeholders rather than requiring scope agreement upfront.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. The agile methodology addresses the inherent uncertainty in cost associated with waterfall:Agile does not specifically address cost uncertainty.Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. Agile development addresses the inflexibility of waterfall as it pertains to changing requirements:This is the primary drawback of Waterfall that Agile addresses through its iterative and flexible approach.Conclusion: This is correct .

C. The agile methodology captures all requirements at the start of a project to reduce risks typically experienced in waterfall:Agile does not capture all requirements upfront; it embraces evolving requirements.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Agile development requires stakeholders to agree to the scope of the project before the work begins, reducing uncertainty in the design:Agile does not require upfront scope agreement; it promotes adaptive planning.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The drawback of Waterfall addressed in Agile is:

B. Agile development addresses the inflexibility of waterfall as it pertains to changing requirements.

The Iterative (or Agile) lifecycle model is specifically designed to deal with changing requirements and a rapid pace of change. Unlike linear models like Waterfall or the V model, which expect requirements to be fixed early, the iterative model delivers the solution in a series of repeated cycles (iterations/sprints). This approach embraces the reality that requirements will change as stakeholders learn more about the evolving product and the business environment shifts. It explicitly incorporates frequent feedback loops and allows for the adaptation of requirements throughout the project, making it the most flexible and suitable model for unstable or complex environments.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Lifecycle Models, Agile/Iterative)

The T-shaped professional model is used in business analysis to describe the ideal mix of skills and knowledge. The 'T' shape consists of a vertical bar and a horizontal bar. The vertical bar represents the deep and specific domain knowledge or core expertise (e.g., business analysis techniques, specific industry knowledge). The horizontal bar (the top of the 'T') represents the multi-disciplinary breadth of skill and knowledge that an individual can apply to various situations. This breadth includes soft skills like communication, facilitation, leadership, and a broad understanding of different business areas (like finance, operations, IT, and strategy). It is this breadth that allows the business analyst to collaborate effectively across different teams and disciplines, understand the context of the change, and recommend truly holistic solutions.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Competencies of a Business Analyst)

To identify the generic business improvement strategy that involves eliminating redundant tasks, we need to analyze each option:

Key Considerations:

Change task sequence: This strategy involves reordering tasks to improve efficiency but does not necessarily eliminate redundancy.

Simplification: This strategy focuses on streamlining processes by removing unnecessary or redundant tasks, making workflows more efficient.

Redefine boundary: This strategy involves changing the scope or boundaries of a process, which may or may not involve eliminating redundant tasks.

Bottleneck removal: This strategy targets specific constraints or bottlenecks in a process but does not focus on eliminating redundant tasks.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Change task sequence:Changing the order of tasks does not inherently eliminate redundancy.Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. Simplification:Simplification directly involves identifying and removing redundant or unnecessary tasks to streamline processes.Conclusion: This is correct .

C. Redefine boundary:Redefining boundaries changes the scope of a process but does not specifically target redundancy.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Bottleneck removal:Removing bottlenecks addresses constraints but does not focus on eliminating redundant tasks.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Scenario analysis is an investigation technique used to explore and evaluate potential future scenarios or situations. It helps stakeholders understand how different factors might impact a business area or process.

Key Characteristics of Scenario Analysis:

Broad View: Scenario analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the business area by considering multiple possible outcomes.

Prototyping Basis: The insights gained from scenario analysis can inform the development of prototypes.

Tacit Knowledge Identification: By exploring real-world scenarios, it helps uncover implicit knowledge embedded in business practices.

Testing Scripts: Scenario analysis is not directly involved in preparing test scripts, which are typically created during the testing phase.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Provides a broad view of the business area under investigation:Scenario analysis evaluates multiple possibilities, offering a broad perspective.Conclusion: This is true .

B. Provides a basis for developing subsequent prototypes:Insights from scenario analysis can guide prototype development.Conclusion: This is true .

C. Helps identify tacit knowledge used in business practice:Exploring scenarios uncovers hidden knowledge and practices.Conclusion: This is true .

D. Helps prepare the scripts that will be used to test the delivered solution:Preparing test scripts is part of testing activities, not scenario analysis.Conclusion: This is false .

The BCS Business Change Lifecycle (which governs the entire change process from initial alignment to final benefit verification) typically comprises five key stages: Alignment, Definition, Design, Implementation, and Realisation. Realisation is the final, crucial stage where the actual benefits and expected business outcomes from the implemented solution are reviewed, measured, and confirmed against the original Business Case. Options A, B, and C are important activities or concepts that occur within the lifecycle but are not one of the five named stages of the complete end-to-end lifecycle model.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Business Change Lifecycle)

Design thinking is a human-centered, iterative approach used to uncover innovative solutions by focusing on user needs and exploring multiple possibilities. It emphasizes creativity, collaboration, and experimentation.

Key Characteristics of Techniques:

Design Thinking: Uses an iterative process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test) to generate innovative options.

Fishbone Diagram: A root cause analysis tool, not focused on innovation.

Rich Pictures: A visual representation of a situation, useful for understanding context but not for generating innovative options.

Mind Maps: A brainstorming tool that organizes ideas hierarchically, but it does not inherently follow an iterative approach.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Design thinking:Design thinking explicitly uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options.Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Fishbone diagram:Fishbone diagrams focus on identifying root causes, not innovation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Rich pictures:Rich pictures visualize complex situations but do not inherently foster innovation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Mind maps:Mind maps organize ideas but do not follow an iterative, innovative process like design thinking.Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The technique that uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options is:

A. Design thinking.

The actor-task level is the lowest and most detailed level of the business process hierarchy. Its purpose is to show the sequence of actions and decisions taken by specific actors to complete a process. It effectively illustrates the work conducted within each individual task (often referred to as the procedure or work instruction). This level details how the work is performed.

Option A describes the Event-Response level (mid-level).

Option C is only part of the description—the actor is crucial, but the level shows the tasks they perform.

Option D describes the trigger for the Event-Response level.

(Reference: BCS Modelling Business Processes / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Business Process Hierarchy)

===========

Scenario development (often linked to Use Case analysis) is a technique that uses narrative descriptions to explore how a business process or a proposed system feature will work. The process of creating a full scenario typically involves several steps: establishing the context, defining the main success scenario, and then exploring alternatives. The step where the handling of unusual conditions or outcomes is considered is Identify exception situations. Exceptions are the circumstances that cause the main path of a process or interaction to be interrupted or fail, and they represent unusual or undesirable deviations from the expected flow. These conditions, which could include error messages, data unavailability, or system failures, must be thoroughly analyzed and documented to ensure the proposed solution is robust and complete. This step is distinct from identifying the main tasks (A) or the normal flow sequence (B).

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Scenarios and Use Cases)

When documenting risks in a business case, it is essential to follow structured processes to ensure risks are appropriately identified, analyzed, and managed. Let’s evaluate each option again based on best practices outlined in the BCS Business Analysis Framework and other methodologies:

Key Considerations:

Risk Documentation: Risks must be recorded systematically to ensure they are visible, actionable, and traceable.

Ownership of Risks: Assigning ownership ensures accountability and clarity about who is responsible for monitoring and mitigating each risk.

Risk Management Lifecycle: The process typically involves identification, documentation, assessment, ownership assignment, and response planning.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Create a RAID log

A RAID log (Risks, Assumptions, Issues, and Dependencies) is a widely used tool in business analysis and project management for capturing and managing risks systematically.

It provides a centralized repository for tracking risks, assumptions, issues, and dependencies, ensuring that risks are documented comprehensively and transparently.

This aligns with best practices for risk management and is a critical first step in ensuring risks are appropriately recorded.

Conclusion: This is a must-do action.

B. Document the source of each risk

While documenting the source of each risk can provide valuable context, it is not a mandatory or primary step in the initial documentation phase.

Sources of risks are often identified during risk analysis or root cause analysis, which occurs after risks have been recorded.

Although useful, this step is secondary to creating a RAID log and assigning ownership.

Conclusion: This is not the most critical action at this stage.

C. Identify an owner for each risk

Assigning ownership for each risk is a fundamental part of risk management. Without clear ownership, risks may remain unmonitored or unaddressed.

Ownership ensures accountability and helps streamline communication and decision-making regarding risk mitigation strategies.

According to the BCS Business Analysis Framework , identifying risk owners is a key responsibility during the risk documentation process.

Conclusion: This is a must-do action.

D. Provide justification for each countermeasure identified

Justifying countermeasures is part of the risk response planning phase, which occurs after risks have been documented, assessed, and prioritized.

At this stage, John’s focus should be on identifying and recording risks, not on evaluating or justifying solutions.

Conclusion: This is not relevant at the documentation stage.

E. Impact assessment of each countermeasure identified

Similar to option D, impact assessments for countermeasures are conducted during the risk response planning phase, not during the initial documentation phase.

This step is premature and does not align with the immediate need to document risks.

Conclusion: This is not relevant at the documentation stage.

Final Recommendation:

Based on the BCS Business Analysis Framework and industry best practices, the two most appropriate actions for John are:

Create a RAID log (to systematically document risks).

Identify an owner for each risk (to ensure accountability and clarity).

These steps ensure that risks are appropriately recorded and managed, laying the foundation for effective risk management.

The Power/Interest Grid is a tool used to determine appropriate strategies for managing different stakeholder groups based on their level of power (influence) and interest in the project. The grid defines four quadrants, each with a recommended management strategy:

High Power, High Interest: Manage Closely

High Power, Low Interest: Keep Satisfied

Low Power, High Interest: Keep Informed

Low Power, Low Interest: Watch (Minimum effort)

The category of Some Power, Some Interest is generally considered the mid-range or main group of stakeholders. For these individuals, the best strategy is to Keep onside (or Manage Regularly). This strategy means maintaining regular communication, involving them in the project at appropriate times, and ensuring their needs and concerns are addressed so that their interest remains positive and their moderate power does not turn against the project.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Stakeholder Management, Power/Interest Grid)

===========

Agile requirements validation ensures that requirements are clear, feasible, and actionable before they are implemented in an iteration. This aligns with Agile principles of delivering value incrementally and avoiding waste.

Key Considerations:

Accurate Estimation for Sprint Planning: While estimation is important, it is not the primary purpose of requirements validation.

Correctness of Backlog Items: Ensuring correctness is part of validation but applies to all backlog items, not just those allocated to an iteration.

Testing Requirements: Testing occurs during or after development, not as part of validation.

Readiness for Development: Validation ensures that requirements are well-defined, understood, and feasible before they are developed.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. To ensure estimation for sprint planning is accurate:Estimation accuracy is important but not the primary purpose of validation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. To ensure any requirements added to the backlog are correct:Correctness applies to all backlog items, not just those allocated to an iteration.Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. To ensure that requirements allocated to an iteration have been tested:Testing occurs after development, not during validation.Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. To ensure any requirements allocated to an iteration are ready to be developed:This is the primary purpose of Agile requirements validation—to ensure requirements are clear, actionable, and feasible before development begins.Conclusion: This is correct .

Final Recommendation:

The purpose of Agile requirements validation is:

D. To ensure any requirements allocated to an iteration are ready to be developed.