Source Path Destination Path Relationship ID Relationship Type
msgld: msragld: 78e304e0-9781-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
msxpgld: msraxpgld: 3ca42ab4-9782-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_docavgld: ndradocavgld: a4b233b2-9783-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_dr: ndradr: c97d36a0-6d7c-11e8-83fb-00a098d771bd XDP
na_gld: ndragld: 9e7e034d-9782-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_mpgld: ndrampgld: 16e52e0d-9783-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_opengld: ndraopengld: dabb1813-9780-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_poc: ndrapoc: c1d632d7-977b-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
na_pubgld: ndrapubgld: 1a3f866c-9780-1234-abcd-00a098d771bd XDP
Referring to the output, which type of SnapMirror destination relationship is being used?
You perform a security trace when troubleshooting a data access problem for a user. The results are shown in the exhibit.
What should you do to solve this issue?
A customer receives the message shown below in their EMS logs.
Tue Jun 27 18:34:18 CEST
[netapp-ct1: cp_worker: wafl.cp.toolong:error]: Aggregate AG1_NTAP_PROD experienced a long CP.
Tue Jun 27 18:37:10 CEST
Which two data sources do you use to explain this message? (Choose two.)
For testing purposes, your customer decides to use FC on a single-node ONTAP cluster. There is only one host that the customer expects to use. High availability is not a concern for this test. The customer connects the host directly to the ONTAP node. The LUN is set up, and the igroup is configured. When the customer tries to attach to the LUN from the host, the LUN is not seen by the host.
Which statement is correct in this scenario?
After a network card was replaced in an ONTAP node, you see the output shown in the exhibit.
What is the problem?
A customer is showing disk utilization is at 100% in Active IQ even though there are low protocol operations on the controller. You review the data shown in the exhibit.
In this situation, what should you do?