NSE5_SSE_AD-7.6 Sample Questions Answers

According to theFortiSASE 7.6 Administration Guideand theFCP - FortiSASE 24/25 Administratorcurriculum, the Agentless deployment mode—commonly referred to asSecure Web Gateway (SWG)mode—is a vital component of the Secure Internet Access (SIA) framework.

Deployment Mechanism: In an agentless deployment, FortiSASE functions as an explicit web proxy. This is achieved by distributing aPAC (Proxy Auto-Configuration) fileto the user's browser, which instructs the device to send its web traffic to the nearest FortiSASE Point of Presence (PoP).

Target Use Case: This mode is specifically designed forunmanaged endpoints, such as those used bycontractors, partners, or temporary workers, where the organization does not have the authority or capability to install the FortiClient agent.

Security Capabilities: Even without an agent, FortiSASE applies afull security stackto the redirected traffic. This includesWeb Filtering,Anti-Malware,SSL Inspection, andInline-CASBto secure HTTP and HTTPS sessions.

Protocol Limitations: Because it relies on proxy settings, this mode is limited to web protocols (HTTP/HTTPS) and does not inherently secure non-web traffic like ICMP, DNS, or custom TCP/UDP applications unless they are specifically proxied.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: While it provides secure browsing, session isolation (RBI) is a specific feature that can be used in either mode; the defining characteristic of the agentless use case is the proxy-based redirection for unmanaged devices.

Option C: A PAC file can only secure web traffic (protocols that support proxying), not non-web traffic protocols.

Option D: Agentless mode is the opposite of requiring FortiClient; ZTNA tags generally require the FortiClient agent to provide the necessary telemetry for tag evaluation.

According to theFortiSASE 7.6 Administration Guideand theFCP - FortiSASE 24/25 Administratorcurriculum, FortiSASE is designed with a hybrid deployment architecture to support various user and device requirements. It primarily operates in two modes:

Endpoint Mode (Agent-based): This mode requires the installation ofFortiClienton the user's laptop or device. The agent establishes an "always-up" secure VPN tunnel to the nearest FortiSASE Point of Presence (PoP), providing full Secure Internet Access (SIA), Secure Private Access (SPA), and endpoint posture checks (ZTNA).

Secure Web Gateway (SWG) Mode (Agentless): This mode is used for users or devices where installing an agent is not feasible (e.g., unmanaged devices or Chromebooks). It relies on explicit web proxy settings or a PAC (Proxy Auto-Configuration) file to redirect web traffic (HTTP/HTTPS) to the SASE PoP for inspection.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: While it supports VPN, "VPN mode" is not the formal name of the deployment type; it is "Endpoint mode".

Option C: FortiSASE is not limited to SWG; it is a full SSE (Security Service Edge) solution including FWaaS and ZTNA.

Option D: ZTNA is a capability within the platform, not a replacement for the overall endpoint or SWG functions.

According to theSD-WAN 7.6 Core Administratorstudy guide andFortiOS 7.6 Administration Guide, the "implicit rule" is the default rule at the bottom of the SD-WAN rule list (ID 0). It is only evaluated if traffic does not match any manually configured SD-WAN rules.

Policy Route Table Context (Option B): SD-WAN rules are technically a specialized form of policy-based routing. For a packet to match theimplicit rule, it must first pass through the routing hierarchy. If traffic matches the implicit rule, it indicates that it did not match any higher-priority user-defined SD-WAN rules or any specific entries in the manualpolicy route tablethat would have intercepted the traffic earlier.

Session Information (Option E): When you use the CLI to inspect an active session (e.g., diagnose sys session list), the output contains a field for theSD-WAN Service ID. If traffic is steered by a user-defined rule, it displays the ID of that rule (e.g., service_id=1). However, when traffic falls through to theimplicit rule, the session information displaysno SD-WAN service ID(it often shows as 0 or is omitted), because the implicit rule does not function as a "service" in the same way user-defined rules do.

Routing Behavior: The implicit rule follows the standard routing table (RIB/FIB) logic. It uses thepriorityanddistanceof the static routes to determine the path. If multiple paths have the same distance and priority, it uses the algorithm set by v4-ecmp-mode, but this is a function of the routing engine, not the SD-WAN engine itself.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: While v4-ecmp-mode (e.g., source-ip-based) is used for ECMP routing, this is part of the general FortiOS routing behavior for equal-cost paths in the FIB, whereas the implicit rule simply "hands over" the decision to that routing table.

Option C: When traffic matches the implicit rule, the session is actually flagged with vwl_id=0 and potentially dirty if a route change occurs, but vwl_default is not the standard flag name used in this specific context in the curriculum.

Option D: This is incorrect because the implicit ruledoes respect weight, distance, and priorityas defined in the static routes within the routing table; it does not distribute traffic "regardless" of these values.

According to theSD-WAN 7.6 Core Administratorcurriculum and the diagnostic outputs shown in the exhibit, the reason traffic is steered toHUB1-VPN3instead of the expectedHUB1-VPN1(defined in SD-WAN rule ID 1) can be explained by two core routing principles in FortiOS:

Valid Route Requirement (Option A): In thediagnose sys sdwan service 4output (which corresponds to Rule ID 1), it shows the rule has membersHUB1-VPN1,HUB1-VPN2, andHUB1-VPN3. A key principle of SD-WAN steering is that for a member to be "selectable" by a rule, itmust have a valid route to the destinationin the routing table (RIB/FIB). If the routing table output (the third section of the exhibit) shows a route to 10.0.0.0/8 viaHUB1-VPN3butnotthroughHUB1-VPN1, the SD-WAN engine will skip HUB1-VPN1 entirely because it is considered a "non-reachable" path for that specific destination.

Policy Route Precedence (Option D): In the FortiOS route lookup hierarchy,Regular Policy Routes (PBR)are evaluatedbeforeSD-WAN rules. If an administrator has configured a traditional Policy Route (found underNetwork > Policy Routes) that matches traffic destined for 10.0.0.0/8 and specifiesHUB1-VPN3as the outgoing interface, the FortiGate will forward the packet based on that policy route and willnever evaluate the SD-WAN rulesfor that session. This "bypass" occurs regardless of whether the SD-WAN rule would have chosen a "better" link.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option B: While member configuration priority (cfg_order) is a tie-breaker in some strategies, the SD-WAN rule logic is only applied if the routing table allows it or if a higher-priority policy route doesn't intercept the traffic first.

Option C: Lower route priority (which means higher preference in the RIB) affects theImplicit Rule(standard routing). However, SD-WAN rules are designed tooverrideRIB priority for matching traffic. If HUB1-VPN1 was a valid candidate and no Policy Route existed, the SD-WAN rule would typically ignore RIB priority to enforce its own steering strategy.

According to theFortiSASE 7.6 Administration Guideand theFCP - FortiSASE 24/25 Administratorstudy materials, theGeofencingfeature is a security measure implemented at the edge of the FortiSASE cloud to control ingress connectivity based on the physical location of the user.

Access Control by Location (Option A): Geofencing allows administrators toallow or block remote user connectionsto the FortiSASE Points of Presence (PoPs) based on the source country, region, or specific network infrastructure (e.g., AWS, Azure, GCP).

Scope of Application: This feature is universal across all SASE connectivity methods. It applies toAgent-based users(FortiClient),Agentless users(SWG/PAC file), andEdge devices(FortiExtender/FortiAP). If a user attempts to connect from a blacklisted country, the connection is dropped at the PoP level before the user can even attempt to authenticate.

Use Case Example: An organization operating exclusively in North America might configure geofencing toblock all connections originating from outside the US and Canada. This significantly reduces the attack surface by preventing brute-force or unauthorized access attempts from high-risk regions or countries where the organization has no legitimate employees.

Configuration Path: In the FortiSASE portal, this is managed underConfiguration > Geofencing. From there, administrators can create an "Allow" or "Deny" list and select the relevant countries from a standardized global database.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option B: While FortiSASE supportsTime-based schedulesfor firewall policies, geofencing is specifically an IP-to-Geography mapping tool for connection admission, not a time-of-day restriction tool.

Option C: Encryption of data at rest on mobile devices is a function of anMDM (Mobile Device Management)solution or local OS features (like FileVault or BitLocker), not a SASE network geofencing feature.

Option D: Monitoring web behavior and blocking non-work content is the role of theWeb FilterandApplication Controlprofiles, which operate on the trafficafterthe connection is allowed by geofencing.

Based on theFortiSASE 7.6 (and later 2025 versions)curriculum and administration guides, the Vulnerability summary dashboard is a key component of the endpoint security posture management.

Drill Down Capability (Option C): According to theFortiSASE Administration Guide, the Vulnerability summary widget on the Security dashboard is interactive. An administrator can click on specific risk categories (e.g., Critical, High) or application types (e.g., Operating System, Web Client) todrill down. This action opens a detailed pane showing the specific affected endpoints, associatedCVE identifiers, and severity classifications based on the CVSS standard.

Automatic Vulnerability Patching (Option D): In theFortiSASE 7.6/2025feature sets, the endpoint profile configuration (underEndpoint > Configuration > Profiles) includes an "Automatic Patching" section. This feature allows the system to automatically install security updates for supported third-party applications and the underlying operating system (Windows/macOS) when vulnerabilities are detected. Furthermore, administrators can schedule these patches directly from theVulnerability Summarywidget by selecting specific vulnerabilities.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: The dashboard categories (Operating System, Web Client, Microsoft Office, etc.) are based on known software signatures. While there is an "Other" category, the dashboard primarily provides scores for recognized applications where CVE data is available.

Option B: The exhibit shows active data (157 total vulnerabilities), which indicates that thevulnerability scan is enabledand currently reporting data from the endpoints. If it were disabled, the widget would be empty or show zeros.

According to theFortiSASE 7.6 Feature Administration Guideand the latest updates to theNSE 5 SASEcurriculum, FortiSASE has introduced native lifecycle management for FortiClient agents to reduce the operational burden on IT teams who previously relied solely on third-party MDM (Mobile Device Management) or GPO (Group Policy Objects) for every update.

TheEndpoint Upgradefeature, found underSystem > Endpoint Upgradein the FortiSASE portal, allows administrators to perform the following:

Centralized Version Control: Administrators can see which versions are currently deployed and which "Recommended" versions are available from FortiGuard.

Scheduled Rollouts: You can choose to upgrade all endpoints or specific endpoint groups at a designated time, ensuring that upgrades do not disrupt business operations.

Status Monitoring: The portal provides a real-time dashboard showing the progress of the upgrade (e.g.,Downloading,Installing,Reboot Pending, orSuccess).

Manual vs. Managed: While MDM is still highly recommended for theinitial onboarding(the first time FortiClient is installed and connected to the SASE cloud), all subsequent upgrades can be handled natively by the FortiSASE portal.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option B: Manual upgrades are inefficient for large-scale deployments (~400 users in this scenario) and are not the intended "feature-rich" solution provided by FortiSASE.

Option C: "Onboarding" refers to the initial setup. Re-onboarding every time a version changes would be redundant and counterproductive.

Option D: While the system canmanagethe upgrade, it is not "auto-upgraded on demand" by the client itself without administrative configuration in the portal. The administrator must still define the target version and schedule.