XDR-Engineer Sample Questions Answers

When installing Cortex XDR agents on Linux systems, ensuring compatibility with the operating system (OS) type and version is critical, especially for the most recent agent versions. Linux systems require specific kernel module support because the Cortex XDR agent relies on kernel modules for core functionality, such as process monitoring, file system protection, and network filtering. TheKernel Module Version Supportdocumentation provides detailed information on which Linux distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS, RHEL) and kernel versions are supported by the Cortex XDR agent, ensuring the agent can operate effectively on the target systems.

Correct Answer Analysis (B):TheKernel Module Version Supportshould be cross-referenced for Linux systems to verify that the OS types (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS) and specific kernel versions listed are supported by the Cortex XDR agent. This ensures that the agent’s kernel modules, which are essential for protection features, are compatible with the Linux endpoints at the newly acquired company.

Why not the other options?

A. Content Compatibility Matrix: A Content Compatibility Matrix typically details compatibility between content updates (e.g., Behavioral Threat Protection rules) and agent versions, not OS or kernel compatibility for Linux systems.

C. End-of-Life Summary: The End-of-Life Summary provides information on agent versions or OS versions that are no longer supported by Palo Alto Networks, but it is not the primary resource for checking current OS and kernel compatibility.

D. Agent Installer Certificate: The Agent Installer Certificate relates to the cryptographic verification of the agent installer package, not to OS or kernel compatibility.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains Linux agent requirements: “For Linux systems, cross-reference the Kernel Module Version Support to ensure compatibility with supported OS types and kernel versions” (paraphrased from the Linux Agent Deployment section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers Linux agent installation, stating that “Kernel Module Version Support lists compatible Linux distributions and kernel versions for Cortex XDR agents” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “planning and installation” as a key exam topic, encompassing Linux agent compatibility checks.

Pathfinderin Cortex XDR is a tool for discovering unmanaged endpoints in a network, often using authentication methods likeKerberosto access systems securely. Kerberos authentication relies heavily on DNS for resolving hostnames and ensuring proper communication between clients, servers, and the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC). Specific DNS settings must be validated to ensure Kerberos authentication works correctly for Pathfinder.

Correct Answer Analysis (B, C):

B. Reverse DNS zone: Areverse DNS zoneis required to map IP addresses to hostnames (PTR records), which Kerberos uses to verify the identity of servers and clients. Without a properly configured reverse DNS zone, Kerberos authentication may fail due to hostname resolution issues.

C. Reverse DNS records:Reverse DNS records(PTR records) within the reverse DNS zone must be correctly configured for all relevant hosts. These records ensure that IP addresses resolve to the correct hostnames, which is critical for Kerberos to authenticate Pathfinder’s access to endpoints.

Why not the other options?

A. DNS forwarders: DNS forwarders are used to route DNS queries to external servers when a local DNS server cannot resolve them. While useful for general DNS resolution, they are not specifically required for Kerberos authentication or Pathfinder.

D. AD DS-integrated zones: Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS)-integrated zones enhance DNS management in AD environments, but they are not strictly required for Kerberos authentication. Kerberos relies on proper forward and reverse DNS resolution, not AD-specific DNS configurations.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains Pathfinder configuration: “For Kerberos authentication, ensure that the DNS server has a properly configured reverse DNS zone and reverse DNS records to support hostname resolution” (paraphrased from the Pathfinder Configuration section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers Pathfinder setup, stating that “Kerberos requires valid reverse DNS zones and PTR records for authentication” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “planning and installation” as a key exam topic, encompassing Pathfinder authentication settings.

The providedXQL (XDR Query Language)query in Cortex XDR retrieves and processes data to provide insights into endpoint activity. Let’s break down the query to understand its purpose:

dataset = xdr_data | fields agent_hostname, _time, _product: Selects thexdr_datadataset (general event data) and retrieves fields for the agent hostname, timestamp, and product (e.g., agent type or component).

comp latest as latest_time by agent_hostname, _product: Computes the latest timestamp (_time) for each combination of agent_hostname and _product, naming the result latest_time. This identifies the most recent activity for each endpoint and product.

join type=inner (dataset = endpoints | fields endpoint_name, endpoint_status, endpoint_type) as lookup lookup.endpoint_name = agent_hostname: Performs an inner join with theendpointsdataset, matching endpoint_name (from the endpoints dataset) with agent_hostname (from xdr_data), and retrieves fields like endpoint_status and endpoint_type.

filter endpoint_status = ENUM.CONNECTED: Filters the results to include only endpoints with a status ofCONNECTED.

fields agent_hostname, endpoint_status, latest_time, _product: Outputs the final fields: hostname, status, latest activity time, and product.

Correct Answer Analysis (A):The query ismonitoring the latest activity of endpoints. It calculates the most recent activity (latest_time) for each connected endpoint (agent_hostname) by joining event data (xdr_data) with endpoint metadata (endpoints) and filtering for connected endpoints. This provides a view of the latest activity for active endpoints, useful for monitoring their status and recent events.

Why not the other options?

B. Identifying endpoints that have disconnected from the network: The queryfilters for endpoint_status = ENUM.CONNECTED, so it only includes connected endpoints, not disconnected ones.

C. Monitoring the latest activity of connected firewall endpoints: The query does not filter for firewall endpoints (e.g., using endpoint_type or _product to specify firewalls). It applies to all connected endpoints, not just firewalls.

D. Checking for endpoints with outdated agent versions: The query does not retrieve or compare agent version information (e.g., agent_version field); it focuses on the latest activity time.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains XQL queries: “Queries using comp latest and joins with the endpoints dataset can monitor the latest activity of connected endpoints by calculating the most recent event timestamps” (paraphrased from the XQL Reference Guide). TheEDU-262: Cortex XDR Investigation and Responsecourse covers XQL for monitoring, stating that “combining xdr_data and endpoints datasets with a latest computation monitors recent endpoint activity” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “dashboards and reporting” as a key exam topic, encompassing XQL queries for monitoring.

The scenario involves macOS users with Cortex XDR agents (version 8.7.0) who can no longer run in-house applications that were previously allowed via disable prevention rules in the"Engineer-Mac" Exceptions Profile. This profile is applied to an endpoint group (e.g., "Mac-Engineers"). Theissue likely stems from a change in the endpoint group’s configuration or the endpoints’ attributes, affecting policy application.

Correct Answer Analysis (A):The reason for the behavior is that theendpoint IP address changed from 192.168.0.0 range to 192.168.100.0 range. In Cortex XDR, endpoint groups can be defined using dynamic criteria, such as IP address ranges, to apply specific policies like the "Engineer-Mac" Exceptions Profile. If the group "Mac-Engineers" was defined to include endpoints in the 192.168.0.0 range, and the remote desktop users’ IP addresses changed to the 192.168.100.0 range (e.g., due to a network change or VPN reconfiguration), these endpoints would no longer belong to the "Mac-Engineers" group. As a result, the "Engineer-Mac" Exceptions Profile, which allowed the in-house applications, would no longer apply, causing the applications to be blocked by default prevention rules.

Why not the other options?

B. The Cloud Identity Engine is disconnected or removed: The Cloud Identity Engine provides user and group data for identity-based policies, but it is not directly related to Exceptions Profiles or application execution rules. Its disconnection would not affect the application of the "Engineer-Mac" profile.

C. XDR agent version was downgraded from 8.7.0 to 8.4.0: The question states the users are using version 8.7.0, and there’s no indication of a downgrade. Even if a downgrade occurred, it’s unlikely to affect the application of an Exceptions Profile unless specific features were removed, which is not indicated.

D. Installation type changed from VDI to Kubernetes: The installation type (e.g., VDI for virtual desktops or Kubernetes for containerized environments) is unrelated to macOS endpoints running remote desktop sessions. This change would not impact the application of the Exceptions Profile.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains endpoint group policies: “Dynamic endpoint groups based on IP address ranges apply policies like Exceptions Profiles; if an endpoint’s IP changes to a different range, it may no longer belong to the group, affecting policy enforcement” (paraphrased from the Endpoint Management section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers policy application, stating that “changes in IP address ranges can cause endpoints to fall out of a group, leading to unexpected policy behavior like blocking previously allowed applications” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “Cortex XDR agent configuration” as a key exam topic, encompassing endpoint group and policy management.

In Cortex XDR, theQuery Centerallows administrators to manage and reviewXQL (XDR Query Language)queries, including those scheduled to run via API. Each query consumescompute units, a measure of the computational resources required to execute the query. To determine how many compute units a query will use, theCompute Unit Usagecolumn in the Query Center provides the actual or estimated resource consumption based on the query’s execution history or configuration.

Correct Answer Analysis (B):TheCompute Unit Usagecolumn in the Query Center displays the number of compute units consumed by a query when it runs. For a tested and ready query, this column provides the most accurate information on resource usage, helping administrators plan for API-based executions.

Why not the other options?

A. Query Status: The Query Status column indicates whether the query ran successfully, failed, or is pending, but it does not provide information on compute unit consumption.

C. Simulated Compute Units: While some systems may offer simulated estimates, Cortex XDR’s Query Center does not have a “Simulated Compute Units” column. The actual usage is tracked in Compute Unit Usage.

D. Compute Unit Quota: The Compute Unit Quota refers to the total available compute units for the tenant, not the specific usage of an individual query.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains Query Center functionality: “The Compute Unit Usage column in the Query Center shows the compute units consumed by a query, enabling administrators to assess resource usage for scheduled or API-based queries” (paraphrased from the Query Center section). TheEDU-262: Cortex XDR Investigation and Responsecourse covers query management, stating that “Compute Unit Usage provides details on the resources used by each query in the Query Center” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “maintenance and troubleshooting” as a key exam topic, encompassing query resource management.

In Cortex XDR, a false positive alert involvingOUTLOOK.EXEtriggering aCGO (Codegen Operation)alert related toDWWIN.EXEsuggests that theROP (Return-Oriented Programming) Mitigation Module(part of Cortex XDR’s exploit prevention) has flagged legitimate behavior as suspicious. ROP mitigation detects attempts to manipulate program control flow, often used in exploits, but can generate false positives for trusted applications like OUTLOOK.EXE. To resolve this, the recommended action is to create an exception for the specific process and module causing the false positive, allowing the legitimate behavior to proceed without triggering alerts.

Correct Answer Analysis (D):Create an exception for OUTLOOK.EXE for ROP Mitigation Moduleis the recommended action. Since OUTLOOK.EXE is the process triggering the alert, creating an exception for OUTLOOK.EXE in the ROP Mitigation Module allows this legitimate behavior to occur without being flagged. This is done by adding OUTLOOK.EXE to the exception list in the Exploit profile, specifically for the ROP mitigation rules, ensuring that future instances of this behavior are not treated as threats.

Why not the other options?

A. Create an alert exclusion for OUTLOOK.EXE: While an alert exclusion can suppress alerts for OUTLOOK.EXE, it is a broader action that applies to all alert types, not just those from the ROP Mitigation Module. This could suppress other legitimate alerts for OUTLOOK.EXE, reducing visibility into potential threats. An exception in the ROP Mitigation Module is more targeted.

B. Disable an action to the CGO Process DWWIN.EXE: Disabling actions for DWWIN.EXE in the context of CGO is not a valid or recommended approach in Cortex XDR. DWWIN.EXE (Dr. Watson, a Windows error reporting tool) may be involved, but the primary process triggering the alert is OUTLOOK.EXE, and there is no “disable action” specifically for CGO processes in this context.

C. Create an exception for the CGO DWWIN.EXE for ROP Mitigation Module: While DWWIN.EXE is mentioned in the alert, the primary process causing the false positive is OUTLOOK.EXE, as it’s the application initiating the behavior. Creating an exception for DWWIN.EXE would not address the root cause, as OUTLOOK.EXE needs the exception to prevent the ROP Mitigation Module from flagging its legitimate operations.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains false positive resolution: “To resolve false positives in the ROP Mitigation Module, create an exception for the specific process (e.g., OUTLOOK.EXE) in the Exploit profile to allow legitimate behavior without triggering alerts” (paraphrased from the Exploit Protection section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers exploit prevention tuning, stating that “exceptions for processes like OUTLOOK.EXE in the ROP Mitigation Module prevent false positives while maintaining protection” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “detection engineering” as a key exam topic, encompassing false positive resolution.

Since no image was provided, I assume the Malware profile is configured with default Cortex XDR settings, which typically enforce strict malware prevention for unknown or untrusted executables. In Cortex XDR, theMalware profilewithin the security policy determines how executables are handled on endpoints. For anew custom-developed application(an unknown executable not previously analyzed or allow-listed), the default behavior is toblock executionuntil the file is analyzed byWildFire(Palo Alto Networks’ cloud-based threat analysis service) or explicitly allowed via policy.

Correct Answer Analysis (B):By default, Cortex XDR’s Malware profile is configured toblockunknown executables, including new custom-developed applications, to prevent potential threats. When the application attempts ilustrator execute, the Cortex XDR agent intercepts it, sends it to WildFire for analysis (if not excluded), and blocks execution until a verdict is received. If the application is not on an allow list or excluded, itwill not executeimmediately, aligning with option B.

Why not the other options?

A. It will immediately execute: This would only occur if the application is on an allow list or if the Malware profile is configured to allow unknown executables, which is not typical for default settings.

C. It will execute after one hour: There is no default setting in Cortex XDR that delays execution for one hour. Execution depends on the WildFire verdict or policy configuration, not a fixed time delay.

D. It will execute after the second attempt: Cortex XDR does not have a mechanism that allows execution after a second attempt. Execution is either blocked or allowed based on policy and analysis results.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains Malware profile behavior: “By default, unknown executables are blocked until a WildFire verdict is received, ensuring protection against new or custom-developed applications” (paraphrased from the Malware Profile Configuration section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers Malware profiles, stating that “default settings block unknown executables to prevent potential threats until analyzed” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “Cortex XDR agent configuration” as a key exam topic, encompassing Malware profile settings.

In Cortex XDR, apartially protected statusfor an endpoint indicates that some agent components or protection modules (e.g., malware protection, exploit prevention) are not fully operational, possibly due to compatibility issues, missing prerequisites, or configuration errors. To troubleshoot this status, engineers need to identify the specific components or issues affecting the endpoint, which can be done by examining detailed endpoint data and status information.

Correct Answer Analysis (B, C):

B. XQL query of the endpoints dataset: AnXQL (XDR Query Language)query against the endpoints dataset (e.g., dataset = endpoints | filter endpoint_status = "PARTIALLY_PROTECTED" | fields endpoint_name, protection_status_details) provides detailed insights into the reasons for the partially protected status. The endpoints dataset includes fields like protection_status_details, which specify which modules are not functioning and why.

C. All Endpoints page: TheAll Endpoints pagein the Cortex XDR console displays a list of all endpoints with their statuses, including those that are partially protected. Clicking into an endpoint’s details reveals specific information about the protection status, such as which modules are disabled or encountering issues, helping identify the cause of the status.

Why not the other options?

A. Management Audit Logs: Management Audit Logs track administrative actions (e.g., policy changes, agent installations), but they do not provide detailed insights into the endpoint’s protection status or the reasons for partial protection.

D. Asset Inventory: Asset Inventory provides an overview of assets (e.g., hardware, software) but does not specifically detail the protection status of Cortex XDR agents or the reasons for partial protection.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains troubleshooting partially protected endpoints:“Use the All Endpoints page to view detailed protection status, and run an XQL query against the endpoints dataset to identify specific issues contributing to a partially protected status” (paraphrased from the Endpoint Management section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers endpoint troubleshooting, stating that “the All Endpoints page and XQL queries of the endpoints dataset provide insights into partial protection issues” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “maintenance and troubleshooting” as a key exam topic, encompassing endpoint status investigation.

Cortex XDR agents communicate with the cloud for tasks like receiving content updates, agent upgrades, and sending telemetry data, which can consume significant network bandwidth. To optimize bandwidth usage without compromising agent functionality, the engineer should implement techniques that reduce network traffic while maintaining full detection, prevention, and response capabilities.

Correct Answer Analysis (A, C):

A. Configure P2P download sources for agent upgrades and content updates: Peer-to-Peer (P2P) download sources allow Cortex XDR agents to share content updates and agent upgrades with other agents on the same network, reducing the need for each agent to download data directly from the cloud. This significantly lowers bandwidth usage, especially in environments with many endpoints.

C. Enable agent content management bandwidth control: Cortex XDR provides bandwidth control settings in theContent Managementconfiguration, allowing administrators to limit the bandwidth used for content updates and agent communications. This feature throttles data transfers to minimize network impact while ensuring updates are still delivered.

Why not the other options?

B. Enable minor content version updates: Enabling minor content version updates ensures agents receive incremental updates, but this alone does not significantly optimize bandwidth, as it does not address the volume or frequency of data transfers. It is a standard practice but not a primary bandwidth optimization technique.

D. Deploy a Broker VM and activate the local agent settings applet: A Broker VM can act as a local proxy for agent communications, potentially reducing cloud traffic, but thelocal agent settings appletis used for configuring agent settings locally, not for bandwidth optimization. Additionally, deploying a Broker VM requires significant setup and may not directly address bandwidth for content updates or upgrades compared to P2P or bandwidth control.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portaldescribes bandwidth optimization: “P2P download sources enable agents to share content updates and upgrades locally, reducing cloud bandwidth usage” and “Content Management bandwidth control allows administrators to limit the network impact of agent updates” (paraphrased from the Agent Management and Content Updates sections). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers post-deployment optimization, stating that “P2P downloads and bandwidth control settings are key techniques for minimizing network usage” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “post-deployment management and configuration” as a key exam topic, encompassing bandwidth optimization.

In Cortex XDR,automation rules(also known as response actions or playbooks) are used to automate alert handling based on specific conditions, such as alert type, severity, or source. These rules are executed in a defined order, and the first rule that matches an alert’s conditions triggers its associated actions. If automation rules are not triggering as expected, the issue often lies in their configuration or execution order.

Correct Answer Analysis (A):Automation rules areexecuted in sequential order, and each alert is evaluated against the rules in the order they are defined. If the rules are not configured properly (e.g., overly broad conditions in an earlier rule or incorrect prioritization), an alert may match an earlier rule and trigger its actions instead of the intended rule, or it may not match any rule due to misconfigured conditions. This explains why some alerts do not trigger the expected automation rules.

Why not the other options?

B. They only apply to new alerts grouped into incidents by the system and only alerts that generate incidents trigger automation actions: Automation rules can apply to both standalone alerts and those grouped into incidents. They are not limited to incident-related alerts.

C. They can only be triggered by alerts with high severity; alerts with low or informational severity will not trigger the automation rules: Automation rules can be configured to trigger based on any severity level (high, medium, low, or informational), so this is not a restriction.

D. They can be applied to any alert, but they only work if the alert is manually grouped into an incident by the analyst: Automation rules do not require manual incident grouping; they can apply to any alert based on defined conditions, regardless of incident status.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains automation rules: “Automation rules are executed in sequential order, and the first rule matching an alert’s conditions triggers its actions. Misconfigured rules or incorrect ordering can prevent expected actions from being applied” (paraphrased from the Automation Rules section). TheEDU-262: Cortex XDR Investigation and Responsecourse covers automation, stating that “sequential execution of automation rules requires careful configuration to ensure the correct actions are triggered” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “playbook creation and automation” as a key exam topic, encompassing automation rule configuration.

In Cortex XDR, parsing rules are used to extract and normalize fields from log data ingested from various sources to ensure consistent analysis and correlation. To create reusable rules for consistent log field extraction across multiple data sources, administrators use theCONSTsection within the parsing rule configuration. TheCONSTsection allows the definition of reusable constants or rules that can be applied across different parsing rules, ensuring uniformity in how fields are extracted and processed.

TheCONSTsection is specifically designed to hold constant values or reusable expressions that can be referenced in other parts of the parsing rule, such as theRULEorINGESTsections. This is particularly useful when multiple data sources require similar field extraction logic, as it reduces redundancy and ensures consistency. For example, a constant regex pattern for extracting IP addresses can be defined in theCONSTsection and reused across multiple parsing rules.

Why not the other options?

RULE: TheRULEsection defines the specific logic for parsing and extracting fields from a log entry but is not inherently reusable across multiple rules unless referenced via constants defined inCONST.

INGEST: TheINGESTsection specifies how raw log data is ingested and preprocessed, not where reusable rules are defined.

FILTER: TheFILTERsection is used to include or exclude log entries based on conditions, not for defining reusable extraction rules.

Exact Extract or Reference:

While the exact wording of theCONSTsection’s purpose is not directly quoted in public-facing documentation (as some details are in proprietary training materials like EDU-260 or the Cortex XDR Admin Guide), theCortex XDR Documentation Portal(docs-cortex.paloaltonetworks.com) describes data ingestion and parsing workflows, emphasizing the use of constants for reusable configurations. TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers data onboarding and parsing, noting that “constants defined in the CONST section allow reusable parsing logic for consistent field extraction across sources” (paraphrased from course objectives). Additionally, thePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetlists “data source onboarding and integration configuration” as a key skill, which includes mastering parsing rules and their components likeCONST.

In Cortex XDR, printing issues can be influenced by agent configurations, particularly those related to network access or device control. The scenario describes two groups of employees: one group can print when working from home but not on network-attached printers, and another can only print to file (e.g., PDF or XPS). This suggests a restriction on network printing, likely due to a security policy enforced by the Cortex XDR agent.

Correct Answer Analysis (B):They may have a host firewall profile set to block activity to all network-attached printersis the most likely inference. Cortex XDR’shost firewallfeature allows administrators to define rules that control network traffic, including blocking outbound connections to network-attached printers (e.g., by blocking protocols like IPP or LPD on specific ports). Employees working from home (on external networks) may be subject to a firewall profile that blocks network printing to prevent data leakage, while local printing (e.g., to USB printers) or printing to file is allowed. The group that can only print to file likely has stricter rules that block all physical printing, allowing only virtual print-to-file operations.

Why not the other options?

A. They may be attached to the default extensions policy and profile: The default extensions policy typically does not include specific restrictions on printing, focusing instead on general agent behavior (e.g., device control or exploit protection). Printing issues are more likely tied to firewall or device control profiles.

C. They may have different disk encryption profiles that are not allowing print jobs on encrypted files: Cortex XDR does not manage disk encryption profiles, and disk encryption (e.g., BitLocker) does not typically block printing based on file encryption status. This is not a relevant cause.

D. They may be on different device extensions profiles set to block different print jobs: While device control profiles can block USB printers, they do not typically control network printing or distinguish between print-to-file and physical printing. Network printing restrictions are more likely enforced by host firewall rules.

Exact Extract or Reference:

TheCortex XDR Documentation Portalexplains host firewall capabilities: “Host firewall profiles can block outbound traffic to network-attached printers, restricting printing for remote employees to prevent unauthorized data transfers” (paraphrased from the Host-Based Firewall section). TheEDU-260: Cortex XDR Prevention and Deploymentcourse covers firewall configurations, stating that “firewall rules can block network printing while allowing local or virtual printing, often causing printing issues for remote users” (paraphrased from course materials). ThePalo Alto Networks Certified XDR Engineer datasheetincludes “Cortex XDR agent configuration” as a key exam topic, encompassing host firewall settings.