PMI-PBA Sample Questions Answers

The best practice in product validation is that the evaluation criteria should be the same as what was used to measure the requirement. Product validation is a process that confirms that the product meets the stakeholder needs and expectations and delivers value to them. Product validation involves testing and verifying the product against predefined criteria and standards that reflect the requirements. The evaluation criteria should be consistent with what was used to measure the requirement during analysis, as this ensures that there is no discrepancy or deviation between what was specified and what was delivered. The measurement of the requirement should not be based on the average of two or more evaluations, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Averaging two or more evaluations may result in inaccurate or misleading results, as it may mask or dilute any errors, defects, or variations in the product quality or performance. Averaging two or more evaluations may also introduce bias or subjectivity into the validation process, as different evaluators may have different methods, tools, or perspectives for measuring the product. There should not be two separate measurements for evaluating each functional requirement, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two separate measurements may create confusion or inconsistency in the validation process, as it may lead to conflicting or contradictory results, depending on how each measurement is defined, performed, or interpreted. Having two separate measurements may also increase complexity or redundancy in the validation process, as it may require more time, effort, or resources to conduct and compare each measurement. Two or more testers should not test the product using the same test cases so that their evaluations are consistent, as this is not a best practice in product validation. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may result in duplication or inefficiency in the validation process, as it may waste time, effort, or resources to perform identical tests without adding any value or information. Having two or more testers use the same test cases may also reduce effectiveness or reliability in the validation process, as it may overlook or ignore any errors, defects, or variations that are not covered by those test cases. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

Problem tracking is a technique that helps the business analyst to manage and resolve issues identified by stakeholders with requirements. It involves creating a clear and concise record of each issue with its description, impact, priority, data, owner, status, and any other relevant information. It also involves tracking and managing the recorded issues until they are resolved. Problem tracking helps to ensure that issues are not neglected or abandoned, and that they are addressed in a timely and effective manner. Problem tracking also exposes the root causes of issues and helps to prevent recurrence of similar problems in the future. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

Requirements status during the project development cycle is the information that should be reported to the stakeholder who wants to know how the implementation of new features in the development of a product is progressing. The requirements status shows how many requirements are in each stage of the development cycle, such as analysis, design, development, testing, or deployment. This information can help the stakeholder understand the progress and quality of the product development and identify any issues or risks that may affect the delivery of the new features. Distribution of project changes is not relevant to the implementation of new features, as it shows how many changes have been requested, approved, or rejected for the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality. Number of requirements approved vs. number of requirements rejected is not relevant to the implementation of new features, as it shows how many requirements have been accepted or discarded by the stakeholders during the requirements analysis phase. Number of requirements tested and approved is not sufficient to report the implementation of new features, as it only shows how many requirements have passed the verification and validation process, but not how many are still in development or deployment stages. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

The system requirements verification matrix is a tool that helps to track the status of each requirement throughout the project lifecycle. It shows whether a requirement has been accepted, rejected, deferred, or implemented. The business analyst should have used this tool to record the reasons for rejection or deferral of any requirement, as well as the impact and resolution of such changes. This way, the business analyst can easily provide a list of rejected and deferred requirements to the project manager upon request. Setting up a change control board is not enough to track the number of rejections, as it does not provide a detailed record of each requirement’s status. Limiting the number of rejected requirements on the project is not a realistic or helpful approach, as some requirements may be invalid, incomplete, or conflicting and need to be rejected or deferred for the benefit of the project. Spending more time up-front reviewing the requirements may reduce the chances of rejections, but it does not guarantee that no requirement will be rejected or deferred later in the project. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 161-162; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

 A change control process is a set of procedures that defines how changes to the requirements are identified, assessed, approved, implemented, and communicated. A change control process helps to ensure that changes are aligned with the business objectives, do not introduce unnecessary risks, and do not adversely affect the quality of the solution. A change control process also helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid scope creep. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, the requirements baseline is a version of the requirements that has been formally reviewed and agreed upon by the stakeholders, and that serves as a basis for further development and validation activities. The requirements baseline is ready for sign-off when the requirements are clear, consistent, complete, and validated. These are the four characteristics of good requirements that ensure that they are understandable, unambiguous, accurate, and feasible. Complete means that the requirements cover all the necessary aspects of the business problem or opportunity, and that they do not have any gaps or omissions. Clear means that the requirements are expressed in simple and precise language, and that they avoid any jargon or ambiguity. Consistent means that the requirements do not have any conflicts or contradictions with each other or with the business objectives. Validated means that the requirements have been checked and confirmed by the stakeholders, and that they meet their needs and expectations. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 183-184.

 A requirements baseline document is the most valuable document for a business analyst to provide to the project sponsor to know which requirements will be implemented. A requirements baseline document is a version of the requirements specification that has been reviewed, approved, and formally established as the basis for further development and delivery of the solution. A requirements baseline document defines the scope of the project and the expected value of the solution. It also serves as a reference point for managing changes and measuring progress. A requirements traceability matrix is a document that shows the relationship between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design, test cases, or deliverables. A requirements traceability matrix can help to ensure completeness, consistency, and quality of the requirements, but it does not indicate which requirements will be implemented. A requirements management plan is a document that describes how requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed throughout the project. A requirements management plan can help to define the roles, responsibilities, processes, and tools for managing requirements, but it does not specify which requirements will be implemented. A reliability matrix is not a standard document in business analysis, but it may refer to a tool that measures the reliability or dependability of a system or a process. A reliability matrix can help to evaluate the performance or quality of a solution, but it does not determine which requirements will be implemented. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Planning is to “Develop a risk management plan for business analysis activities and monitor risks, issues, and assumptions” (Task 9). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for identifying, analyzing, and managing the risks that may affect the business analysis activities and deliverables. If the risks are not addressed properly, they may result in deviations from the baseline budget, schedule, scope, or quality of the product. Therefore, the issue in this scenario could be that the risks identified in the risk management plan were not addressed properly.

A requirements traceability tool is a tool that provides combined functionality for business analysis and quality assurance activities. It helps to document and track the relationships and dependencies among the requirements, the sources of the requirements, and the project deliverables. It also helps to monitor the status, changes, and verification of the requirements throughout the project life cycle. A requirements traceability tool can also support the analysis, validation, and testing of the requirements, as well as the evaluation of the solution quality and performance12.

A functional specification tool is a tool that helps to define and document the functional requirements of a system or a solution. It describes the features, functions, behaviors, and inputs and outputs of the system or the solution. It also specifies the acceptance criteria and the expected results of the system or the solution. A functional specification tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities13.

A system use case modeling tool is a tool that helps to illustrate and communicate the interactions and scenarios between the users and the system or the solution. It uses diagrams, symbols, and text to represent the actors, use cases, relationships, and flows of events of the system or the solution. It also defines the preconditions, postconditions, and exceptions of each use case. A system use case modeling tool is mainly used for business analysis activities, but not for quality assurance activities14.

A solution quality assurance tool is a tool that helps to measure and evaluate the quality of the system or the solution. It uses various methods and techniques, such as testing, inspection, review, audit, and feedback, to check the quality of the system or the solution against the quality standards and criteria. It also identifies and reports any quality issues, defects, or errors of the system or the solution. A solution quality assurance tool is mainly used for quality assurance activities, but not for business analysis activities1 .

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121; 3 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 133; 4 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 135; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 125

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, user acceptance testing is a technique that involves verifying and validating that the solution meets the business requirements and satisfies the stakeholder needs and expectations. User acceptance testing is usually performed by the end users or their representatives, who evaluate the solution against predefined acceptance criteria and provide feedback on its functionality, usability, performance, quality, etc. User acceptance testing can help to determine whether a solution satisfies business requirements, as it can demonstrate that the solution delivers the intended business value and benefits, and that it meets or exceeds the stakeholder satisfaction. By reviewing the results of user acceptance testing, a business analyst can assess how well the solution meets business requirements, and identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed or resolved. Evaluating the solution against the project charter, conducting a brainstorming session with end users, or reviewing the traceability matrix are other ways to analyze and validate requirements, but they do not necessarily determine whether a solution satisfies business requirements, as they do not involve testing or evaluating the solution in real or simulated conditions. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 317-318.

 A survey is a technique to collect information, opinions, or feedback from a large number of stakeholders, such as customers or users. A survey can help to measure the current level of customer satisfaction and loyalty, and to identify the needs and expectations of the customers for the tool. A survey can provide a basis for analyzing vendor products by comparing their features, benefits, and costs with the customer requirements. The other options are not suitable for this purpose. A storyboard is a technique to visualize the user interface or user experience of a solution using sketches or mockups. A project charter is a document that authorizes the project and defines its objectives, scope, and stakeholders. A business case is a document that provides the justification for initiating a project based on its expected benefits, costs, and risks. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 50.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a subject matter expert (SME) is a person who has specialized knowledge or skills in a particular domain or area. A SME can provide valuable insights, information, and guidance to the project team, especially when the project involves a new or unfamiliar market. By hiring external SMEs for the core project team, the business analyst can help to ensure that the project has the necessary expertise and resources to perform the business analysis activities effectively and efficiently. External SMEs can also help to identify and validate the business needs, requirements, and solutions for the new market, and to reduce the risks and uncertainties associated with the project. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

Interface modeling is a technique to describe how different components or systems interact with each other and exchange information. Interface modeling can be used to depict how the solution will work with all of the company’s systems by showing the inputs, outputs, and dependencies of each system. Interface modeling can help to identify potential integration issues, gaps, and conflicts among the systems. The other techniques are not suitable for this purpose. Data modeling is a technique to define the structure, format, and relationships of data. Rules modeling is a technique to define the logic, constraints, and policies that govern the behavior of the solution. Enterprise modeling is a technique to describe the structure, culture, and processes of an organization. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 11; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 54.

 An organizational chart is a tool that helps to visualize the structure and hierarchy of an organization, as well as the roles and responsibilities of its members. It can also show the relationships and interactions between different units, departments, or teams within the organization. An organizational chart can help the business analyst to identify the missing project stakeholders by showing who are involved in or affected by the online ordering system, such as the purchasing department. A business case is a tool that helps to justify the need and value of a project or initiative, as well as the costs and benefits associated with it. It does not provide information about the project stakeholders. A business analysis plan is a tool that helps to define the scope, approach, activities, deliverables, and schedule of the business analysis work. It does not provide information about the project stakeholders. A business analyst communication plan is a tool that helps to determine the communication needs, methods, frequency, and channels for the business analysis work. It does not provide information about the project stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, Organizational Chart - What is an Organization Chart? Definition, Types, Tips, Tutorial, and Examples

A review is a technique that involves examining a work product, such as requirements, to identify errors, omissions, inconsistencies, or ambiguities. A review can be formal or informal, depending on the level of rigor and documentation required. A review can be conducted by the business analyst alone or with other stakeholders, such as the project manager, the sponsor, the subject matter experts, or the end users. A review can be done through various methods, such as reading, walkthroughs, inspections, or peer reviews. The purpose of a review is to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they meet the quality standards and expectations of the stakeholders. By conducting a review, the business analyst can obtain approval from the stakeholders and confirm their agreement and commitment to the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 23; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 131.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, one of the best strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria is to clearly define the performance measures and targets for the solution, such as accuracy, reliability, availability, efficiency, etc. These measures and targets help to evaluate how well the solution meets the stakeholder needs and expectations, and how it contributes to the business value. In this case, since the operations manager is concerned about the accuracy of the new measurement system, a good strategy would be to clearly define the maximum acceptable error rate for the new system, which would indicate how accurate the system should be in order to be accepted by the stakeholder. Quantifying the risks associated with measurement errors, asking for a formal acceptance of requirements documents, or planning a training session for the new system are not effective strategies to define appropriate acceptance criteria, as they do not specify how the performance of the solution will be measured or evaluated. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 316-317.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system or a process to achieve a specific goal. A use case can help to prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as it can capture the functional requirements and the expected behavior of the system or the process, as well as the exceptions and alternative flows. A use case can also help to design and execute test cases that cover all the possible scenarios and outcomes. In this case, a use case could have prevented the problem of a worker using a field that was not supposed to be used, as it could have specified the valid inputs and outputs for the report, and the actions and responses of the system or the process. Prototyping, diagrams, and document analysis are other techniques that can help to analyze and communicate requirements, but they do not necessarily prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as they do not describe the interactions and outcomes of the system or the process in detail. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 165-166.

Internal rate of return (IRR) is a technique that calculates the annualized rate of return of an investment or a project. IRR can help the business analyst to determine the estimated growth rate of potential solution options by comparing the present value of the expected cash inflows and outflows of each option. IRR can also help to select the option that has the highest rate of return and exceeds the minimum required rate of return or the cost of capital. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

 A traceability matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project life cycle. It helps to track changes in requirements, assess their impact, and ensure that they are met by the project deliverables. A traceability matrix is a useful tool for document control, as it records the version history of each requirement and the rationale for any changes. A statement of work, a project plan, and a problem or opportunity statement are not methods of document control, but rather documents that describe the project scope, objectives, activities, and justification. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9 1; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121 2

 Moscow analysis is a tool or technique that the business analyst can use with the stakeholders to prioritize the requirements to determine which requirements are approved, deferred, or rejected. Moscow analysis is a method of categorizing requirements into four groups: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have. Must-have requirements are essential and non-negotiable for the project success. Should-have requirements are important but not critical for the project success. Could-have requirements are desirable but not necessary for the project success. Won’t-have requirements are out of scope or low priority for the current project. Moscow analysis can help to identify the most valuable and feasible requirements that can be delivered within the available time and budget. It can also help to manage stakeholder expectations and resolve conflicts or disagreements on the priority of the requirements. SMART goals is a tool or technique that can be used to define clear and measurable objectives for a project or a process, but it does not help to prioritize the requirements. SMART goals are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. SWOT analysis is a tool or technique that can be used to assess the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a project or a process, but it does not help to prioritize the requirements. SWOT analysis can help to identify the internal and external factors that affect the project or process performance and quality. Timeboxing analysis is not a standard tool or technique in business analysis, but it may refer to a method of allocating a fixed amount of time for each task or activity in a project or a process, but it does not help to prioritize the requirements. Timeboxing analysis can help to manage time and resources efficiently and effectively. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

A fishbone diagram, also known as a cause-and-effect diagram or an Ishikawa diagram, is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the possible causes of a problem or an effect. It can help the business analyst to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing. A fishbone diagram has a structure that resembles a fish skeleton, with a head, a spine, and several branches. The head represents the problem or the effect, the spine represents the main cause categories, and the branches represent the sub-causes or factors that contribute to the problem or the effect. By creating a fishbone diagram, the business analyst can brainstorm and organize the potential causes of the software flaw, and then investigate and verify the most likely root cause. A fishbone diagram can also help to communicate the findings and recommendations to the stakeholders and the development team. An interface analysis is a tool that helps to identify and describe the interactions and dependencies between different components or systems. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not focus on the causes and effects of the problem. A Delphi estimation is a tool that helps to obtain a consensus among a group of experts on a complex or uncertain issue. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not provide a systematic and structured way to identify and analyze the causes of the problem. A functional decomposition is a tool that helps to break down a complex system or process into smaller and simpler components or functions. It does not help to perform a root cause analysis in order to analyze and resolve the discrepancy identified through user acceptance testing, as it does not show the relationships and influences between the components or functions. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, Root Cause Analysis: Definition, Examples & Methods | Tableau1

 Time-boxing is a prioritization technique that involves assigning a fixed amount of time or resource to each requirement or deliverable, and delivering as much value as possible within that time or resource constraint. Time-boxing is useful when the project has a tight timeline or budget, and the stakeholders have too many requirements for the delivery window. Time-boxing helps to focus on the most important and valuable requirements, and to manage the expectations and scope of the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 97.

The change management plan outlines the process for managing changes to requirements, ensuring that any revisions are controlled and documented throughout the project lifecycle. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a requirements traceability matrix is a tool that helps to ensure that the requirements are aligned with the business needs and objectives, and that they are verified and validated throughout the project life cycle. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to identify gaps, redundancies, and inconsistencies in the requirements. If the requirements matrix did not adequately track back to client requirements, it could result in a product that does not meet the client’s expectations or specifications, even if it passes the test plan. Therefore, it is important to establish and maintain a clear and accurate traceability of requirements from their source to their implementation and verification. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 179-180.

A business requirement is a statement that describes a business need or problem that must be addressed by the project. It should be stated in terms of what the business wants to achieve or improve, not how it will be done. The requirement in the question states a solution (an API) rather than a business need (synchronizing name and address data). It should be revised to focus on the business need and avoid specifying a solution. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 7; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 35.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a vision/scope document is a document that describes the high-level vision, scope, and objectives of a project or initiative. It also defines the key stakeholders, business needs, expected benefits, assumptions, constraints, and risks. A vision/scope document can help to align the stakeholders’ views of organizational improvement with the project’s purpose and direction. It can also help to establish a common understanding and agreement among the stakeholders, and provide a basis for planning and prioritizing the requirements. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, the business analyst should recommend the option with the highest functionality score and the lowest cost score. In this case, option A, 1, Custom solution, has the highest functionality score of 10 and the lowest cost score of 1. Therefore, it should be recommended. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a Pareto analysis is a tool that helps to prioritize problems or causes based on their frequency or impact. It is based on the Pareto principle, which states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. A Pareto analysis can help to identify the high-priority changes needed to improve a service by showing which problems or causes account for most of the complaints or dissatisfaction. A work breakdown structure analysis, a flowchart, and a cause-and-effect diagram are other tools that can help to analyze a service, but they do not necessarily help to prioritize the changes needed to improve it. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 145-146.

 MoSCoW is a requirements prioritization method that classifies requirements into four categories: Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. This method helps the business analyst and the stakeholders to agree on the essential requirements that must be delivered within a fixed time frame, and the desirable requirements that can be deferred or dropped if necessary. MoSCoW is suitable for this project because it allows the business analyst to focus on the minimum viable product that meets the business need of replacing the current enrollment and billing software application before the vendor contract ends, and to cope with the large volume of requirements by prioritizing them based on their value and urgency. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a prototype is a tool that can be used to demonstrate the features and functionality of a product or solution in an iterative manner. A prototype can help to elicit, validate, and verify requirements, as well as to obtain feedback and approval from stakeholders. A prototype can also help to reduce risks, errors, and rework, and to increase customer satisfaction and quality. A proof-of-concept model is a type of prototype that is used to test the feasibility and viability of a product or solution. A proof-of-concept model can help to show the benefits and value of the product or solution, and to identify any technical or business challenges or constraints. References:

• PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List
• PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

Version control is a technique that helps to manage changes to requirements and ensure that only authorized changes are made. It also helps to maintain a history of requirements changes, which records the date, reason, and impact of each change. Tracking the status of each requirement helps to monitor the progress and completion of requirements throughout the project life cycle. These practices help to ensure the integrity of requirements and avoid confusion, inconsistency, or ambiguity. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 8; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 38.

The next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards is to ensure that the requirements are validated. Validation is a process that confirms that the requirements align with the business objectives, stakeholder needs, and expected value of the project. Validation also ensures that the requirements are feasible, acceptable, and testable. Validation can be performed by using techniques such as reviews, walkthroughs, inspections, or demonstrations. Validation can help to identify and resolve any errors, gaps, or conflicts in the requirements before they are approved and implemented. Setting the priority of the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that determines the order and importance of the requirements based on their value, risk, urgency, or dependency. Priority can be set before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not verify or confirm that the requirements meet the stakeholder expectations or project goals. Communicating the requirements to stakeholders is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that involves sharing and presenting the requirements to relevant stakeholders for feedback, approval, or implementation. Communication can be done before or after comparing the requirements to quality standards, but it does not check or ensure that the requirements are aligned with the business objectives or deliver value to the stakeholders. Baselineing the requirements is not the next step that the business analyst should take after comparing the requirements to internal and external quality standards, as it is a process that establishes an agreed-upon version of the requirements as a reference point for further changes or development. Baselineing can be done only after validating and approving the requirements, as it implies that they are complete, correct, clear, and consistent. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 113-114; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17.

 A user survey is a technique that can be used to determine how well the solution meets the business case. A user survey is a method of collecting feedback from the end users of the solution about their satisfaction, preferences, expectations, needs, problems, or suggestions. A user survey can help to measure the performance, quality, usability, and value of the solution and compare it with the expected benefits and outcomes defined in the business case. A user survey can also help to identify areas for improvement or enhancement of the solution. Asking the sponsor for feedback is not sufficient to determine how well the solution meets the business case, as it does not capture the perspective of the end users who are directly affected by the solution. Surveying the project is not relevant to this scenario, as it does not focus on the solution but rather on the project management processes and practices. Comparing the results of day-in-the-life (DITL) testing and integration testing is not effective, as it does not reflect the actual usage and experience of the solution by the end users after deployment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

Verification is the process of ensuring that the requirements meet a quality checklist and conform to the specified standards, rules, and criteria. Verification can help the business analyst to ensure that all requirements meet a quality checklist before the development and testing phase by checking the completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability of each requirement. Verification can also help to identify and resolve any defects, errors, or ambiguities in the requirements. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

A functional requirement is a requirement that specifies what the system should do or how it should behave under certain conditions. A functional requirement describes the functionality, behavior, or performance of the system. An example of a functional requirement is the system is able to require passwords, which defines a security feature of the system that prevents unauthorized access. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

A decision tree is a tool that can be used to analyze how the system responds to various combinations of input conditions with the probability of each outcome. A decision tree is a graphical representation of a decision problem that shows the possible choices and their consequences. A decision tree can help to evaluate the expected value of each alternative and choose the optimal one. Functional decomposition is a tool that can be used to break down a complex system or process into smaller and simpler components. Expected monetary value is a tool that can be used to calculate the average outcome of a decision under uncertainty by multiplying the value of each outcome by its probability and summing them up. Weighted criteria is a tool that can be used to prioritize requirements or alternatives based on their importance and performance scores. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

Before beginning requirements elicitation, the business analyst should document how the relevant systems interact. This is an important activity that helps to understand the current state of the systems, their interfaces, dependencies, and data flows. It also helps to identify the gaps, issues, and opportunities for improvement in the systems. Documenting how the systems interact can be done using various techniques, such as system context diagrams, data flow diagrams, or interface analysis12.

Preparing the requirements traceability matrix, defining how the solution will be evaluated, and drafting a high-level data model are not activities that should be initiated before beginning requirements elicitation. These activities are part of the analysis, validation, and management of the requirements, and they should be done after the requirements have been elicited12.

References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 10-11; 2 Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 131-132

 Prototyping is a technique that involves creating a simplified or partial version of the solution to elicit feedback from the stakeholders. Prototyping can help the business analyst to deal with a complex project with stakeholders who find it difficult to articulate their needs by providing a visual and interactive representation of the solution. Prototyping can also help to reduce requirements risk by validating or verifying the requirements, identifying gaps or errors, and resolving ambiguities or conflicts. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

A questionnaire is an elicitation technique that involves sending a set of written questions to a large number of users or stakeholders to gather information about their needs, preferences, opinions, or feedback. A questionnaire is best suited for eliciting information from a large group of users in a short period of time, as it is cost-effective, easy to administer, and allows for anonymity and standardization. A questionnaire can also reach users who are geographically dispersed or unavailable for face-to-face meetings. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.2.9; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain III: Analysis, Task 2.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, the business analyst’s role during acceptance testing is to ensure that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the stakeholders, and that it delivers the intended business value. One of the ways to do this is to assist the quality assurance department by defining acceptance criteria, which are measurable and observable conditions that must be met for the solution to be accepted by the stakeholders. Acceptance criteria help to verify and validate that the solution meets the requirements and conforms to the quality standards. Executing all acceptance tests on behalf of the user community, delegating execution of acceptance testing and defect identification to users, or acting as a resource only when users encounter difficulties while performing tests are not effective strategies for the business analyst’s role during acceptance testing, as they do not ensure the involvement and satisfaction of the stakeholders, or the alignment of the solution with the business needs and objectives. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 316-317.

A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to their sources, objectives, and deliverables. It helps to track the status, changes, and verification of each requirement throughout the project life cycle. If the requirements traceability matrix was not updated with the change, it could result in a key requirement being missed or overlooked in the implementation. The other options are not likely to cause this problem. The requirements management plan is a document that describes how the requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed. The scope management plan is a document that describes how the project scope will be defined, controlled, and verified. The schedule management plan is a document that describes how the project schedule will be developed, monitored, and controlled. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39; 6.

To reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project, the business analyst plans to reuse requirements. Requirements are statements that describe the needs, expectations, or capabilities of the stakeholders or the solution. Requirements can be reused from previous or similar projects, as long as they are relevant, consistent, and compatible with the current project context and objectives. Reusing requirements can help to save time and effort, avoid duplication or redundancy, leverage best practices, and ensure quality and compliance. Quantitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Quantitative analysis is a technique that involves using numerical data and methods to measure, compare, or evaluate the feasibility, value, or impact of a solution or an alternative. Quantitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. Risk assessments are not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Risk assessments are techniques that involve identifying and analyzing potential threats or uncertainties that may affect the project or the solution. Risk assessments can help to prioritize, mitigate, or monitor risks, but they do not provide requirements for the product specification. Qualitative analysis is not something that the business analyst plans to reuse to reduce the amount of time and effort needed to create a product specification for a project. Qualitative analysis is a technique that involves using descriptive data and methods to understand, interpret, or evaluate the characteristics, behaviors, or perceptions of the stakeholders or the solution. Qualitative analysis can be performed for different purposes and at different stages of the project, but it does not provide requirements for the product specification. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 114-115; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 17-18.

Managing solution scope is the task of ensuring that the solution meets the agreed-upon requirements and delivers the expected value to the stakeholders. Managing solution scope involves analyzing the impact of any changes to the scope, assessing the feasibility and risks of the changes, and obtaining approval from the stakeholders before implementing the changes. Managing solution scope can help the business analyst to identify the impacts, dependencies, or risks associated with the addition to the scope. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 83.

 The business analyst would use brainstorming to identify stakeholders. Brainstorming is a technique that involves generating ideas or solutions through a group discussion or a creative thinking process. Brainstorming can help the business analyst to identify potential stakeholders who have an interest, influence, or impact on the project or the solution, and to solicit their input and feedback on the project requirements and expectations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 38.

External dependencies are the factors or conditions that are outside the control of the project, but may affect its scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risks. External dependencies may include legal, regulatory, cultural, environmental, political, economic, or technological factors. An organization that is evaluating the possibility of conducting business internationally should investigate these factors at the onset of the initiative, as they may have significant impacts on the feasibility, viability, and desirability of the project. The other options are not factors that should be investigated at the onset of the initiative. Deliverables to be produced are the outputs or results of the project that meet the stakeholder requirements. Impacts on requirements baseline are the changes or deviations from the approved set of requirements that define the solution scope. Change control processes are the procedures and tools that manage how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risks are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. These factors are determined or addressed during the planning or execution phases of the project, not at the onset of the initiative. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39; 4.

The business need is the reason why the project is initiated and the problem or opportunity that the project aims to address. The business need defines the key business drivers and the desired outcomes of the project. By asking what the business need is, the business analyst can understand the value proposition of the project and prioritize the requirements that align with the business objectives and deliver the most benefits to the stakeholders. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 23.

The requirements approval process is documented as a measure of effective decision making that allows the business analyst to finalize the process for requirement approval. The requirements approval process defines the roles, responsibilities, criteria, methods, and tools for approving the requirements and ensuring that they meet the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements approval process should be agreed upon by the stakeholders and the business analyst before the requirements are elicited, analyzed, and validated. The requirements verification process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for ensuring that the requirements are complete, correct, consistent, and clear. The requirements elicitation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a set of activities for discovering, gathering, and understanding the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements validation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for confirming that the requirements align with the business objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113-114 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 17 2.

The business analyst should use document analysis as an elicitation technique during this time. Document analysis is a technique that involves reviewing and analyzing existing documents, such as policies, procedures, standards, reports, or contracts, to elicit information about the business needs, requirements, or solution options. Document analysis is useful when the stakeholders are not available to participate, or when the business analyst needs to gain background knowledge or context before engaging with the stakeholders. Document analysis can also help to identify gaps, issues, or assumptions that need to be clarified or validated with the stakeholders later. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 51.

 A capability table is a tool that lists the current capabilities of an application and compares them with the desired capabilities identified by the end users. A capability table can help the business analyst to analyze this information and determine project scope by showing the gaps between the current and future states of the application, and prioritizing the new features that will address those gaps. A capability table can also help to define the high-level requirements and objectives of the project. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 67.

Functional specifications are a type of requirements documentation that describes what the system or product should do in terms of functions, features, behaviors, inputs, outputs, etc. Functional specifications can help the business analyst to document the requirements in a way that is clearly understood by the development team and provides enough information to check if the requirement has been met. Functional specifications can also include acceptance criteria, test cases, data models, user interface designs, etc. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 39.

Clear and unambiguous requirements are crucial for verification. Ambiguity can lead to misunderstandings and difficulty in assessing whether the product meets the specified needs during testing. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

 A use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system to achieve a goal or perform a task. A use case consists of a main scenario and possible alternative scenarios that capture the normal, exceptional, and error flows of events. A use case can be used as a source for building tests of end-to-end business processes across business functions and systems, as it provides a comprehensive and realistic view of the expected behavior and outcomes of the solution. A use case can also help to verify and validate the functional requirements and acceptance criteria of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 99.

 Team peer review is a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Team peer review is a technique that involves having a group of peers or experts examine and evaluate the requirements for quality, completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability. Team peer review can help to identify any ambiguous or unverifiable requirements that may cause confusion, misunderstanding, or errors in the project. Team peer review can also provide feedback and suggestions for improvement or resolution of any issues or defects in the requirements. Fishbone analysis is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Fishbone analysis is a technique that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or an effect by analyzing its contributing factors and their relationships. Fishbone analysis can help to understand why a problem exists or why an effect occurs, but it does not directly examine or evaluate the quality of the requirements. Resource checklist is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Resource checklist is a tool that is used to identify and document the resources needed to perform business analysis activities, such as people, tools, facilities, equipment, etc. Resource checklist can help to plan and manage the resources required for business analysis work, but it does not assess or verify the quality of the requirements. Traceability matrix is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and document the relationships and dependencies among requirements and other project elements, such as design, test cases, risks, issues, etc. Traceability matrix can help to monitor and control changes to requirements and ensure alignment with project objectives and stakeholder needs, but it does not measure or validate the quality of the requirements. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 162-163; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

Status is a critical field that is needed to ensure that the traceability matrix is usable. Status indicates the current state of each requirement, such as approved, deferred, implemented, tested, or verified. Status helps to track the progress and completion of requirements throughout the project life cycle. It also helps to identify any gaps or discrepancies that may exist between the requirements and the project deliverables. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

A business rule is a statement that defines or constrains some aspect of the business and always resolves to either true or false. Business rules are intended to assert business structure or to control or influence the behavior of the business. Business rules describe the operations, definitions and constraints that apply to an organization. Business rules can apply to people, processes, corporate behavior and computing systems in an organization, and are put in place to help the organization achieve its goals. By documenting a business rule, the business analyst can ensure that the business need can be validated against the criteria that govern the business operations and outcomes. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 19; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 97.

User acceptance testing (UAT) is a process that should be done by the business analyst after the software developers have delivered a completed solution and the quality assurance team has passed it. User acceptance testing is a process of verifying that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the end users and delivers value to them. User acceptance testing involves preparing test cases, scenarios, or scripts based on the acceptance criteria, executing them with representative users or stakeholders, collecting feedback, identifying defects or issues, and obtaining sign-off or approval for deployment. User acceptance testing can help to ensure that the solution is fit for use, suitable for purpose, and aligned with business objectives. Evaluating the solution against the project charter is not necessary at this stage, as it does not involve testing or validation by the end users or stakeholders. Evaluating the solution with the sponsor(s) is not sufficient at this stage, as it does not capture the perspective of all relevant users or stakeholders who will use or benefit from the solution. Conducting performance testing is not relevant at this stage, as it is usually done by the quality assurance team before delivering the solution to ensure that it meets the non-functional requirements such as speed, reliability, scalability, etc. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.