OGBA-101 Sample Questions Answers

 An organization map is a technique that can be used to show how a business architecture addresses stakeholder concerns across different parts of an organization3. It can highlight gaps or overlaps in the coverage of stakeholder concerns by a business architecture. An organization chart, on the other hand, is a diagram that shows the formal structure and hierarchy of an organization, such as reporting relationships and roles4. An organization chart does not necessarily show how stakeholder concerns are addressed by a business architecture.

An organization map differs from an organization chart in that it is designed to show more than just the formal hierarchy and relationships between different units within an organization. It provides a view of the enterprise from the perspective of the business architecture, highlighting areas where stakeholder concerns might not be addressed effectively, whereas an organization chart typically shows the formal reporting structures only.

When developing the Architecture Vision, which is part of the TOGAF ADM Phase A, architects should examine the Architecture Principles and Business Goals. These components provide the foundational guidance and the strategic context for the architecture work. They ensure that the resulting architecture aligns with the overall direction and objectives of the enterprise.

A TOGAF business scenario is a technique that can be used to fully understand the requirements of information technology and align it with business needs1. It is not a business case, which is a document that provides justification for a proposed project or initiative6. It is not a method to develop a business model, which is a description of how an organization creates, delivers, and captures value for its stakeholders7. It is not a use-case, which is a description of how a system interacts with external actors to achieve a specific goal.

A TOGAF business scenario is a technique that helps to derive architecture requirements by describing a business process, application, or set of activities. It includes detailing the actors, roles, goals, business policies, business processes, and the environment in which the scenario takes place. Business scenarios are used within TOGAF to ensure that the architecture has a clear link to the business requirements.

The Architecture Development Method (ADM) is the core process of TOGAF which outlines a method for developing and managing the lifecycle of enterprise architecture. Considering the phases of the ADM, the item labeled as '2' in the provided architecture development cycle diagram likely corresponds to the 'Architecture Change Management' phase, which is responsible for providing ongoing architectural oversight and guidance to ensure that the implementation remains aligned with the architecture defined in the previous phases. This includes managing changes to the architecture in a controlled manner as the implementation progresses and ensuring that the architecture continues to meet the business needs.

According to the TOGAF Series Guide to Value Streams (Version 1), a value stream stage is defined as “a distinct part of a value stream that represents a group of activities contributing to an overall result” 5. A value stream stage can be expressed as a noun phrase that indicates what outcome or state is achieved by completing the stage5. For example, some possible value stream stages are “Product Ordered”, “Payment Processed”, or “Customer Satisfied”. The example value stream shows how an online retailer creates and delivers value for its customers by performing five value stream stages: “Acquire Retail Product”, “Advertise Channels”, “Display Products”, “Enable Selection”, “Process Payment”, and “Deliver Product(s)” 5. Therefore, the value stream is decomposed into five value stream stages.

Heat mapping is an analysis technique used to provide a visual representation of data, often to show performance against a set of criteria. In the context of business capabilities, heat maps can be used to represent various dimensions such as maturity levels, investment priorities, risk levels, etc., on the same set of business capabilities. This allows different stakeholders to quickly grasp where attention is needed or how capabilities align with strategic priorities.

A business capability is a conceptual representation that reflects the core abilities or capacities of a business. It is defined as an intrinsic ability that an organization possesses or can develop to consistently deliver a specific outcome or set of outcomes. Business capabilities abstract away from the organizational structure, processes, and technology to focus on the 'what' the business can do, rather than the 'how' it does it. This concept is fundamental in business architecture as it helps in aligning strategic objectives with operational efficiency.

A statement of business goals and drivers can be used to help define information concepts in an information map. This statement provides the context and rationale for the information requirements of the enterprise, which can then be reflected in the information map, ensuring that the information architecture supports the business objectives.

The diagram of an architecture development cycle shows three phases of the TOGAF ADM. The correct phase names corresponding to the labels 1, 2 and 3 are Requirements Management, Implementation Governance, and Preliminary respectively3. These phases are described as follows:

• Requirements Management (label 1): This phase provides a process for managing architecture requirements throughout the ADM cycle3. It ensures that requirements are captured, stored, prioritized, and addressed by relevant ADM phases3. It also ensures that requirements are validated and updated as necessary3.
• Implementation Governance (label 2): This phase provides a process for ensuring that the implementation projects conform to the defined architecture3. It involves establishing an implementation governance model, defining architecture contracts and compliance reviews, and monitoring and supporting the implementation projects3.
• Preliminary (label 3): This phase provides a process for preparing and planning the architecture project3. It involves defining the scope and vision of the project, customizing the ADM process and content framework, defining principles and governance structures, and evaluating the enterprise architecture maturity and readiness3.

A value stream is an approach to modeling business value that focuses on the end-to-end sequence of activities that an organization performs to deliver a product or service to the customer. This perspective is designed to help organizations understand the full lifecycle of value creation, from the initial customer demand to the final delivery of value. It provides a holistic view of the flow of value through the organization and is instrumental in identifying areas of waste and opportunities for improvement to enhance the overall customer experience. Value streams help in visualizing and optimizing the steps necessary to effect change in the business processes and systems that create value for the customers.

One of the guidance for creating value streams is to start with customer-based value streams2. Customer-based value streams are those that describe how an enterprise creates and delivers value for its external customers2. Starting with customer-based value streams can help to ensure that the value streams are aligned with the customer needs and expectations, as well as the enterprise’s value proposition and strategic objectives2. Customer-based value streams can also provide a foundation for identifying and defining other types of value streams, such as internal or partner-based value streams.

The ADM Phases that match the purpose descriptions provided are: Phase C for the development of Information Systems Architectures to support the agreed Architecture Vision, Phase F for addressing the move from the Baseline to the Target Architectures by finalizing a detailed Implementation and Migration Plan, Phase G for providing architectural oversight of the implementation, and Phase D for describing the development of the Technology Architecture to support the agreed Architecture Vision.

To analyze a new value stream within the scope of a project, it is effective to combine information mapping with a business process model. This approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the value stream, including the information required and produced at each stage, and how this information supports the business processes involved in delivering value.

The example value stream shown, labeled "Acquire Retail Product," represents a decomposition into a sequence of stages that collectively create value. Each stage, such as "Advertise Channels," "Display Products," "Enable Selection," "Process Payment," and "Deliver Product(s)," is a step in the overall process that contributes to the final outcome, which in this case is the acquisition of a retail product by the customer. Value streams are utilized in business architecture to model the flow of value through an organization from the initial customer demand to the final delivery of the product or service.

One of the benefits of Value Stream Mapping is that it helps to assess an organization’s effectiveness at creating, capturing, and delivering value for different stakeholders2. Value Stream Mapping is a technique that can be used to represent a sequence of activities that create an overall result for a customer, stakeholder, or end user2. Value Stream Mapping can help to identify the value proposition, outcomes, measures, enablers, and dependencies of each activity in the value stream, as well as the overall value flow and performance2. By analyzing the value stream map, the organization can evaluate how well it is meeting the stakeholder needs and expectations, as well as identify opportunities for improvement or innovation.