Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association CFRP Dumps

Trauma-informed care is a cornerstone of supporting health and wellness in the CFRP framework. When a child who has experienced a traumatic event avoids discussing it during an assessment, the practitioner should allow the child to disclose at their own pace, respecting their emotional readiness and avoiding re-traumatization. The CFRP study guide emphasizes, “In trauma-informed assessments, practitioners should allow children to disclose details of traumatic events at their own pace to ensure safety and trust.” Asking the parent (option A) may be a secondary step but bypasses the child’s autonomy. Referring to a therapist (option C) or continuing questioning (option D) may be premature or harmful without first establishing trust.

CFRP Study Guide (Section on Supporting Health and Wellness): “When a child avoids discussing a traumatic event during assessment, practitioners should allow disclosure at the child’s own pace, prioritizing safety and trust in trauma-informed care.”

TheAssessment, Planning, and Outcomesdomain emphasizes dynamic, collaborative service planning. ThePRA CFRP Study Guide 2024-2025states that best practice requires service plan goals to be regularly reviewed and updated to reflect the child’s progress and changing needs, ensuring relevance and effectiveness.

OptionA(Reviewed on a consistent basis) is correct because the PRA framework mandates ongoing evaluation of goals to adapt to the child’s development and circumstances, typically through regular meetings with the family.

OptionB(Constant and measurable) is incorrect because goals should not remain constant; they must evolve. While measurability is important, it is not the focus of this question.

OptionC(Developed by the practitioner) is incorrect because goals must be co-developed with the family, per the PRA’s family-centered approach.

OptionD(General and applicable to a variety of behaviors) is incorrect because goals should be specific (e.g., SMART goals), not vague or broadly applicable.

Within the CFRP framework, interpersonal competencies involve recognizing behavioral patterns and defense mechanisms in family interactions. The mother’s action of purchasing expensive concert tickets after embarrassing her daughter by being intoxicated is an example of undoing, a defense mechanism where an individual attempts to reverse or mitigate a negative action through a compensatory positive act. The CFRP study guide explains, “Undoing is a defense mechanism where an individual engages in a positive act, such as gift-giving, to counteract a harmful or embarrassing action, as seen when a parent tries to repair a relationship after a negative incident.” Rationalizing (option A) involves justifying behavior. Conversion (option B) relates to physical symptoms from psychological stress. Compensation (option C) addresses perceived deficiencies, not specific acts.

CFRP Study Guide (Section on Interpersonal Competencies): “Undoing occurs when an individual performs a positive act, such as giving gifts, to mitigate the impact of a prior negative action, such as causing embarrassment.”