L5M6 Sample Questions Answers

When many suppliers exist, buyers have multiple options, increasing their bargaining power. Suppliers must compete for contracts, shifting power toward the buyer.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.112 – Porter’s Five Forces: Buyer Power]

Cross-Functional Teams (CFTs) are essential in category management, as they bring together expertise from different areas of the organisation. Their success depends on having a clear, articulated purpose and endorsement from leadership to ensure authority and resource allocation. It is not necessary to have exactly four functions (the guidance suggests three or more), nor for all members to have technical expertise—CFTs should balance technical, procurement, legal, and operational knowledge. Strong leadership support ensures the team’s recommendations are implemented, while a clear purpose ensures alignment and focus. Without these, CFTs risk becoming unfocused discussion groups with limited impact.

The two most important factors when assessing supply chain risks are Severity and Likelihood. These are typically measured on a scale [e.g., 1–5], with the product of the two giving a risk score.

Severity measures the potential impact on the organisation if the risk materialises. For example, supplier insolvency may severely disrupt operations.

Likelihood assesses the probability of the event occurring.

The combination of severity × likelihood determines whether a risk is low, medium, or high, and informs mitigation strategies.

Other options are less central:

Location may influence likelihood but is a sub-factor.

People involved is not a formal assessment criterion.

Cost can be a consequence but is part of severity, not a separate factor.

Using severity and likelihood ensures risks are prioritised based on both impact and probability, allowing category managers to allocate resources effectively.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.40 – Risk assessment and mitigation protocols]

Risk assessments in procurement often use a likelihood × severity matrix. Risks are scored on scales from 1–5, and the scores are multiplied. A score of 2 indicates a minor risk with low impact and/or low probability. For comparison, risks with scores in the upper range (e.g., 20–25) are considered major risks that demand immediate mitigation. Minor risks, although not ignored, are often monitored rather than heavily resourced. This structured approach ensures procurement teams focus resources on the most significant threats while still maintaining oversight of low-level risks. By categorising risks this way, category managers create clarity for decision-makers and align procurement risk management with enterprise-wide frameworks.

The correct sequence of Category Strategy Development is:

Create the strategic plan – outlining objectives, tactics, and desired outcomes.

Develop a progress tracking plan – defining performance measures and milestones.

Define resources needed – identifying staff, skills, and financial support required.

Conduct a roadshow – presenting the strategy to stakeholders and gaining buy-in.

This order ensures strategies are clearly defined before resources are committed and that tracking mechanisms are in place to measure success. The roadshow is critical to gain organisational support and alignment, ensuring all stakeholders understand the plan and contribute to its implementation. Mis-sequencing these steps can result in wasted resources, poor engagement, or ineffective execution. Category managers must follow this structured approach to maintain accountability, transparency, and long-term success in strategy implementation.

The services industry does not have a specific SIC code because it is highly diverse, spanning multiple activities that do not fit neatly into a single classification.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.88 – SIC classification limitations]

Direct costs are those directly attributable to the production of goods or services. For BikeFace, raw materials such as rubber (used in tyres) and labour (workers assembling bicycles) are direct costs because they contribute directly to finished products. By contrast, advertising spend and IT systems are indirect costs as they support operations but do not directly form part of the bicycle. Category managers must distinguish between direct and indirect costs to design effective sourcing strategies. Direct categories often warrant closer supplier collaboration and longer-term contracts due to their critical role in production.

A SWOT Analysis distinguishes between internal factors (strengths and weaknesses) and external factors (opportunities and threats). Strengths are internal capabilities, resources, or skills that give the organisation an advantage in the market—such as strong supplier relationships, unique expertise, or cost leadership. Weaknesses are internal limitations, such as lack of investment, poor technology, or inadequate processes. These are factors the organisation has direct control over and can improve. On the other hand, opportunities and threats are external influences outside the business’s direct control, such as market trends, legislation, or competitor actions. For category management, applying SWOT allows managers to assess the current position of categories and design strategies that build on strengths and address weaknesses. This analysis also ensures that procurement strategies remain aligned with organisational goals and competitive environments. The correct recognition of internal versus external factors is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and wasted effort.

A Category Plan is a strategic document that sets out how a category will be managed to deliver organisational objectives. It typically includes:

Supply market analysis to understand supplier dynamics, competition, and risks.

Category objectives, which align with organisational strategy and specify what procurement aims to achieve.

Category risks, which outline potential threats and mitigation strategies.

HR information and a full history of the category are not required, as the plan is forward-looking, focusing on strategy rather than operational details. While historical context may be summarised in an executive overview, it does not form a full section. A well-structured Category Plan supports better decision-making, stakeholder engagement, and ensures consistent management of spend. It provides a roadmap for how value will be captured, risks managed, and supplier relationships developed. Without it, category management risks becoming reactive and fragmented.

The most effective approaches are:

Limiting dependence on one supplier [B]: CIPS suggests no more than 30% of spend should be concentrated with a single supplier. This reduces exposure if that supplier becomes insolvent or fails to deliver.

Having contingency plans [D]: Preparing alternative suppliers, safety stock, or emergency logistics ensures continuity in case of failure.

Options A and C are poor practices:

Using fewer suppliers [A]: Increases dependency, making the business more vulnerable.

Using small start-ups exclusively [C]: Increases risk because these firms often lack financial stability.

These strategies align with broader supply risk management principles, which focus on diversification, resilience, and proactive planning. Effective category managers must balance efficiency with risk reduction, ensuring supply continuity without over-consolidating.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.57 – Supplier risk mitigation strategies]

A Category Board [sometimes called a Category Council or Committee] is a cross-functional group of stakeholders responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of a category strategy. It brings together representatives from procurement, finance, operations, and other relevant departments to ensure that sourcing decisions align with overall business objectives.

While boards may also review spending or risk, their main role is strategic governance. They provide input into category planning, approve strategies, resolve conflicts, and ensure stakeholder buy-in. This collaboration is essential, as category management is a cross-functional discipline that cannot succeed if procurement operates in isolation.

Options A and B are too narrow, while option D is unrealistic—no body can “mitigate all risks.” Instead, the board ensures risks are recognised and addressed within the strategy.

The study guide highlights the importance of such structures in embedding category management within an organisation’s governance framework.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, pp.614 – Category Boards and governance in category management]

The Pareto Principle, also known as the 80/20 Rule, states that around 80% of outcomes are generated by 20% of inputs. In category management, this means that a small number of categories often account for the majority of total spend. Identifying these high-impact categories allows procurement professionals to focus resources where they deliver the most value. For example, managing a few strategic or high-spend categories rigorously may yield more savings and risk reduction than spreading efforts across all categories equally. The principle reinforces the need for prioritisation and focus in procurement strategies. While Six Sigma and Porter’s Five Forces are useful tools in other contexts, they are unrelated to spend distribution. Applying Pareto effectively helps organisations achieve better results with limited resources by focusing on what matters most.

A bull industry is one that is experiencing sustained growth, driven by technological innovation, consumer demand, or favourable market conditions. The opposite is a bear industry, which is in decline. The terms are borrowed from stock market language but are also used in category management to describe the overall trajectory of an industry. For ABC Ltd, operating in a bull industry means it must prepare for higher demand, increased competition, and potential supplier shortages. This requires a proactive category strategy that focuses on securing long-term supplier relationships, investing in innovation, and managing risks associated with rapid growth. Recognising industry cycles ensures that procurement strategies are forward-looking and aligned with long-term organisational objectives. Misclassifying an industry’s trajectory could lead to missed investment opportunities or poor resource allocation.

Supply chain risks are risks that involve suppliers or logistics networks and have a direct impact on procurement performance. Poorly defined contract terms (Option A) may cause service failure, while delays due to port strikes (Option D) disrupt inbound logistics. These are classic supply chain risks because they are linked to supplier performance or external logistics factors. By contrast, lightning striking HQ is an internal operational risk, and a consultant giving poor advice is a professional service risk rather than a direct supply chain issue. For procurement, identifying supply chain risks is critical to developing mitigation strategies such as alternative suppliers, buffer stock, or stronger contractual clauses. Risk assessment frameworks like the likelihood/severity matrix help prioritise which risks to address first.

A Bull Industry is one that is experiencing strong growth, with positive demand and market expansion expected in the future. In financial terms, “bull” markets are characterised by optimism, rising investment, and business confidence.

For ABC Ltd, operating in a high-growth IT sector, this categorisation is appropriate because demand is projected to increase. This means opportunities exist for innovation, supplier partnerships, and long-term strategic sourcing.

By contrast:

Bear industries represent declining markets, where firms face shrinking demand.

Dog and Cow industries are not recognised terms within category management; they are distractors in this question.

Identifying whether an industry is in a bull or bear phase helps Category Managers assess market risks, supplier relationships, and investment priorities.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.150 – Market classifications: bull vs bear industries]

Category Management delivers multiple benefits for organisations, including:

Fewer supplier contracts, achieved by consolidating spend and reducing fragmentation.

Improved supplier relations, as suppliers are engaged strategically rather than transactionally, enabling stronger collaboration.

Increased innovation, which arises when procurement works closely with suppliers to develop new solutions and efficiencies.

Other benefits highlighted by CIPS include better pricing, improved terms and conditions, stakeholder satisfaction, enhanced risk management, and improved spend visibility. The incorrect options—“less staff required” and “better use of IT systems”—may result indirectly from streamlined procurement, but they are not primary benefits recognised in the category management framework. The true value of category management lies in shifting procurement from a transactional function to a strategic enabler of value. By grouping spend into categories and applying tailored strategies, organisations achieve economies of scale, better market intelligence, and stronger alignment with business objectives.

Within Category Management, sub-categories are often referred to as commodities. These are narrower groupings within a category that focus on specific goods or services. For example, within the Construction category, commodities might include raw materials, subcontracted labour, or specialist equipment hire. Recognising commodities helps procurement apply tailored strategies that address their specific market dynamics and risk profiles. It also provides clarity when developing category plans, as different commodities may require different sourcing and supplier management approaches. By managing at both category and commodity levels, organisations can strike a balance between broad strategic alignment and detailed tactical execution.

A General Ledger [GL] is the central accounting record used by businesses to prepare financial reports. It categorises all financial transactions into cost codes, allowing managers to track expenditure, revenue, assets, and liabilities.

For category managers, the General Ledger provides visibility into spend categories. This information supports spend analysis and helps in mapping organisational costs against suppliers, categories, and business functions. It differs from line item detail by offering a higher-level financial view.

Other options are misleading:

Option A [tenders] relates to e-procurement platforms, not financial records.

Option C [catalogue] refers to item listings, not ledgers.

Option D [supplier lists] relates to approved supplier databases.

By using GL data, procurement can ensure alignment with finance, strengthening compliance, budgeting, and strategic sourcing decisions.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.135 – Use of General Ledger in procurement analysis]

The three key enablers are People, Tools, and Technology. Each plays a distinct but interconnected role in making category management effective:

People: Skilled category managers and cross-functional teams provide the expertise, negotiation skills, and stakeholder engagement needed for success. Without trained professionals, strategies cannot be executed effectively.

Tools: Analytical frameworks like Kraljic’s Matrix, spend analysis, TCO, and risk assessment tools enable informed decision-making. These provide structure and evidence for procurement strategies.

Technology: Digital platforms such as e-procurement systems, data analytics software, and supplier relationship management [SRM] tools support efficiency, transparency, and scalability.

By contrast, options such as “Place” and “Environment” are not formal enablers within CIPS’s framework. While environmental and cultural context matter, they are not listed as the three foundational enablers.

The study guide emphasises that category management can only be effective when these three enablers work together—skilled people using appropriate tools and supported by the right technology.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.6 – Enablers of Category Management]

The first step in A.T. Kearney’s 7 Step Model of Strategic Sourcing is Supplier Portfolio Generation. The model provides a structured approach to sourcing, beginning with an understanding of current spend and supplier landscape before progressing to strategy development and implementation.

The seven steps are:

Profile spend and supply base.

Develop sourcing strategy and cost comparison.

Generate supplier portfolio.

Select implementation path.

Select competitive suppliers.

Integrate operations with suppliers.

Continuously benchmark supply market.

The reason supplier portfolio generation is first is because procurement must identify potential suppliers and the overall supply base structure before choosing strategies or engaging in competitive selection. Skipping this step risks building a strategy without understanding available market options.

Thus, while options C and D are important later in the process, they cannot occur without first mapping the supplier portfolio.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, Chapter 1.2 – Strategic Sourcing Models, esp. p.31–32]

In category management, reliable decision-making depends heavily on the analysis of historical spend data. According to CIPS, the key forms of usable historical data include:

Spend analytics: consolidated information showing how much has been spent, on what items, and with which suppliers.

Line item details: transaction-level data that provides specific insight into products or services purchased.

Ledger codes: financial classifications that group expenditure for reporting and control purposes.

These data sets allow category managers to identify trends, supplier dependency, opportunities for consolidation, and potential cost savings. In contrast, inflation rates and spend forecasts are forward-looking metrics, not historical data. Using accurate historical information is critical for preparing budgets, supporting negotiations, and identifying anomalies in expenditure. Organisations that fail to utilise this data often struggle to align their category strategies with financial realities, leading to overspending or missed opportunities.

The correct stage is Market/commodity and options [including make vs buy assessment], which is Stage 2 of the CIPS Procurement and Supply Cycle. This stage focuses on analysing the external market, internal requirements, and identifying whether to make a product in-house or source it externally.

A Make vs Buy assessment helps determine whether the organisation has the capacity, skills, and resources to produce the item internally, or whether outsourcing would deliver greater value. Factors such as cost, risk, quality, lead time, and strategic alignment are evaluated.

Other stages differ:

High-level specification [Stage 1]: Focuses on defining what is needed, not sourcing decisions.

Develop strategy/plan [Stage 3]: Comes after options are analysed, where the sourcing path is chosen.

Market engagement [Stage 4]: Involves engaging suppliers, which cannot happen until the Make vs Buy decision is made.

This makes Stage 2 the most accurate point for such an assessment.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, pp.35–36 – Procurement Cycle, Make vs Buy analysis]

The first stage of Kearney’s 7 Step Model is profiling the category, where data is gathered about spend, suppliers, and demand. This profiling provides the foundation for preparing future projections and budgets. It ensures that procurement understands not only how much is currently being spent, but also the likely future requirements of the organisation. While finding alternative suppliers and benchmarking may emerge later in the process, the primary outcome of category profiling is reliable information for budgeting and strategic decision-making. This stage links procurement with financial planning and helps build business cases for category strategies. Without accurate data profiling, subsequent sourcing strategies may be flawed.

Total Cost of Ownership [TCO] refers to the full cost of acquiring, operating, and maintaining an item over its entire lifecycle—not just the purchase price. For Steve, the relevant elements are:

Purchase Price [A]: The initial acquisition cost.

Maintenance and Downtime [D]: Costs of repairs, spare parts, and losses during equipment downtime.

Training [E]: Expenses incurred in training staff to use new systems or equipment.

By contrast, Location and Supplier Relationship are important considerations but cannot be quantified as direct financial costs in the same way.

The TCO model is often illustrated as the Cost Iceberg, where the purchase price is only the visible tip, while hidden costs [e.g., energy use, repairs, obsolescence, disposal] represent the bulk. Understanding TCO enables procurement to make more informed decisions, ensuring long-term value rather than focusing narrowly on upfront cost.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.9 – TCO and the Cost Iceberg]