L4M2 Sample Questions Answers

Explanation

This International Standard (ISO 27001:2013) has been prepared to provide requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system. The adoption of an information security management system is a strategic decision for an organization. The establishment and implementation of an organization’s information security management system is influenced by the organization’s needs and objectives, security requirements, the organizational processes used and the size and structure of the organization. All of these influencing factors are expected to change over time.

The information security management system preserves the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information by applying a risk management process and gives confidence to interested parties that risks are adequately managed.

It is important that the information security management system is part of and integrated with the organization’s processes and overall management structure and that information security is considered in the design of processes, information systems, and controls. It is expected that an information security management system implementation will be scaled in accordance with the needs of the organization.

This International Standard can be used by internal and external parties to assess the organization's ability to meet the organization’s own information security requirements.

The order in which requirements are presented in this International Standard does not reflect their importance or imply the order in which they are to be implemented. The list items are enumerated for reference purpose only.

ISO/IEC 27000 describes the overview and the vocabulary of information security management systems, referencing the information security management system family of standards (includ-ing ISO/IEC 27003[2], ISO/IEC 27004[3] and ISO/IEC 27005[4]), with related terms and defini-tions.

Explanation

In this question, you should understand the concept of cash flow and formula of cash flow. Cash flow calculates the physical money moving in and out a company's bank balance. The cash flow from sale activity is:

cash flow from sale = account receivable at beginning of the year + revenue - account receivable at the end of the year = $450,000 + $5,000,000 - $525,000 = $4,925,000

75% of direct costs was bought by credit, therefore, the company spent 25% on direct cost: -$2,500,000*25/100 = -$625,000

25% of indirect costs was bought on credit. Cash flow out on indirect costs is: -$3,000,000*75/100 = -$2,250,000

Company spent $1,500,000 on new assets funded by a loan of $1,000,000. Cash flow out from this activity is -$500,000

Company received $150,000 from selling old assets

Dividends have not been paid for another 2 months, thus, they are not accounted as cash flow out.

The bank balance at the end of the year is: $175,000 + $4,925,000 - $625,000 - $2,250,000 - $500,000 + $150,000 = $1,875,000

LO 1, AC 1.4

Detailed Explanation:

1 (Reduces design need): Performance specifications focus on outcomes rather than detailed designs, saving buyer resources.

2 (Wider supply base): Allowing suppliers to propose their own solutions can attract a broader range of suppliers.Options 3 and 4 align with conformance specifications, not performance-based ones. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Specification Writing.

Explanation

In this scenario, the final product has vast range of parts. The second problem is lacking any part can cause disruption to the production process. So GE has 2 things to do: to reduce the part varie-ties, and secure the supply. Part standardisation is the best option here. It can simplify the range of parts or materials used, and simultaneously, it expands the supply base of GE. If a supplier fails to deliver the part, the company always has other options to replace.

Costs are also a concern, but bottleneck in production imposes a serious risk to the organisation. Driving down costs using market competition cannot be a foremost priority.

Increasing production may help to reduce bottleneck. However, it will also increase the inventory of finished products and unnecessary upkeep costs.

LO 3, AC 3.4

Detailed Explanation:

Social sustainability focuses on ethical considerations like fair labour practices, inclusivity, and community development. By addressing these criteria, FSB Group aligns with responsible business practices. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Sustainability in Procurement.

Detailed Explanation:

Cotton fabric is a direct cost because it is directly attributable to the production of the garments. Costs like rent, utilities, and payroll are indirect costs associated with running the business. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Cost Categorization in Procurement.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Sustainable Procurement Evaluation)

Environmental criteria: carbon emissions, waste, resource efficiency.

Social criteria: labour standards, equality, community impact.

Thus, 1 and 2 fit perfectly.

Items 3 and 4 are quality or service considerations, not sustainability metrics.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Incorporating sustainability in tender evaluation”

“Triple bottom line and responsible sourcing”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Specification Types)

Outcome (or output) specifications define what outcome must be achieved, leaving suppliers freedom to decide how.

They are appropriate when multiple solutions can deliver the same performance.

Option C directly reflects this.

Options A, B, and D contradict the flexibility principle.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Performance and outcome-based specifications”

“Encouraging innovation through output requirements”

Explanation

One of the biggest disruptors in retail has been e-commerce. According to a report by IDC, in the month of December 2018, which is also the holiday season in the west, the e-commerce sector globally, has grown by 20 percent.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Cost Management and Analysis)

CIPS teaches that indirect costs (e.g. overheads, admin, factory costs) can be estimated by using:

Supplier financial statements,

Benchmarking,

Industry cost models.

Analysing these supports negotiations by revealing true cost drivers.

Therefore, Option B is correct — buyers can and should assess indirect costs when evaluating total cost and negotiating.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Understanding direct and indirect cost elements”

“Cost analysis and should-cost models in business case preparation”

Explanation

Technical standards are often produced by a national or international body such as British Standard Institute (BSI)

LO 3, AC 3.1

Explanation

A responsibility assignment matrix[1] (RAM), also known as RACI matrix[2] (/ˈreɪsi/) or linear responsibility chart[3] (LRC), describes the participation by various roles in complet-ing tasks or deliverables for a project or business process. RACI is an acronym derived from the four key responsibilities most typically used: responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed.[4] It is used for clarifying and defining roles and responsibilities in cross-functional or departmental projects and processes.[5] There are a number of alternatives to the RACI model.

Role distinction[edit]

There is a distinction between a role and individually identified people: a role is a descriptor of an associated set of tasks; may be performed by many people; and one person can perform many roles. For example, an organization may have ten people who can perform the role of project manager, although traditionally each project only has one project manager at any one time; and a person who is able to perform the role of project manager may also be able to perform the role of business analyst and tester.

R = Responsible (also recommender)Those who do the work to complete the task.[6] There is at least one role with a participation type of responsible, although others can be delegated to assist in the work required (see also RASCI below for separately identifying those who participate in a sup-porting role).

A = Accountable (also approver or final approving authority)The one ultimately answerable for the correct and thorough completion of the deliverable or task, the one who ensures the prerequi-sites of the task are met and who delegates the work to those responsible.[6] In other words, an accountable must sign off (approve) work that responsible provides. There must be only one accountable specified for each task or deliverable.[7]

C = Consulted (sometimes consultant or counsel)Those whose opinions are sought, typical-ly subject-matter experts; and with whom there is two-way communication.[6]

I = Informed (also informee)Those who are kept up-to-date on progress, often only on completion of the task or deliverable; and with whom there is just one-way communication.[6]

Very often the role that is accountable for a task or deliverable may also be responsible for com-pleting it (indicated on the matrix by the task or deliverable having a role accountable for it, but no role responsible for its completion, i.e. it is implied). Outside of this exception, it is generally recommended that each role in the project or process for each task receive, at most, just one of the participation types. Where more than one participation type is shown, this generally implies that participation has not yet been fully resolved, which can impede the value of this technique in clarifying the participation of each role on each task.

Explanation

Value analysis is often defined as a systematic process for improving the value of a product, service or project. It is typically used in the following ways:

- To determine the value of each component used

- To find cost reduction opportunities by optimising the components used

Segment analysis helps procurement and supply to shape and manage the supply markets.

There is no concept known as Variety reduction.

Standardisation is the process which is used to reduce varieties of products or parts.

In this scenario, the company's objective is cost reduction, then value analysis or value engineering is more likely to be applied. Also the company aims at reducing variety, standardisation can be combined with value analysis to produce the best results.

LO 3, AC 3.4

Explanation

Writing a high-quality specification is very crucial in every purchase. In through-life management, it is even more important since the assets often have very high value. Defining user requirement is the first step to write a specification. Without doing this right, many problems may arise in later stages.

Detailed Explanation:

Conformance specifications outline specific technical standards or requirements that a product must meet. These ensure uniformity and compliance but do not allow flexibility for suppliers to innovate. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Specification Standards.

Explanation

Those items make up small portion of spend and the supply risk is low. So it is tactical item according to Kraljic portfolio matrix. Procurement should bundle these items into larger contracts, simplify procurement process.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Explanation

There are three major types of buying situations, which are new purchase, modified rebuy and straight rebuy. Three factors make the buying situations be different from the others, customers may face different problems in these situations.

A new purchase is a situation requiring the purchase of a product for the very first time.

A straight rebuy is when a company places a second order with a supplier that is identical to the first purchase it made.

A modified rebuy is when a company orders again from a supplier, but wants to change some as-pect of the order, such as the quantity, packaging, product features, or delivery times. The scenario above is an example of modified rebuy.

Detailed Explanation:

A (Production materials): These are directly tied to the production of goods and are variable costs.

D (Manufacturing staff wages): Labour directly involved in the production process is a direct cost.

Indirect costs like salaries, depreciation, and insurance are related to overheads and not directly tied to production. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Cost Structures.

Detailed Explanation:

Acceptance testing verifies that the supplied product meets the buyer’s specification before it is formally accepted. This type of testing typically occurs during delivery or installation phases. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Quality Assurance in Procurement.

Explanation

Lean design is about maximising the value that a customer receives and at the same time minimis-ing waste in delivering that value.

For an organisation to be ‘lean’ it must have had all non-essential resources removed (ie. anything that does not add value, see below). This is efficient and cost effective, in that the value/supply chain can theoretically do exactly what is needed of it and no more, but requires sound forecasting and planning of demand and supply. It is most suitable for industries with stable product specifications, long lead times and few impulse purchases.

Organisations which are ‘agile’ react as quickly as is practicable to provide a cost effective response to customer demand. This is based on flexibility in design, supply, production and distribution. It is most appropriate for products such as fast fashion and foodstuffs which must be on display and available when wanted by the customer.

Explanation

Using standards in specification is very convenient. They reduce the time and effort to produce. They tend to be very accurate with correct technical terminologies. They are well recognised and accepted by a wide range of suppliers and buyers. However, since a standard is very specific, complex and lengthy, it requires a lot of time to be drafted and approved. Therefore, standard tends to be static and don't encourage innovation. It may also not accommodate latest technology and trends.

Explanation

Start-up costs are generally low in service industries, and the main requirement is a level of knowledge and skill in that particular service.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Detailed Explanation:

The bargaining strength of suppliers and buyers is a key factor influencing market competitiveness, as outlined in frameworks like Porter’s Five Forces. These forces dictate pricing, supply availability, and value delivery. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Market Analysis and Competitive Forces.

Explanation

The bargaining power of supplier is a major determinant of the structure of an industry and also how much profit is available to organisation operating in that industry. Supplier is weak if:

- Substitutes are available and easy to access

- Suppliers are small and fragmented

- The industry is important to the seller

- The sellers' product or service is not an important of the industry's value chain

- The sellers' product or service is undifferentiated

- There are no significant switching costs

- There is no threat of forward integration.

Suppliers may have more power:

- If they are in concentrated numbers compared to buyers.

- If there are high switching costs associated with a move to another supplier.

- If they are able to integrate forward or begin producing the product themselves.

- If they have specific expertise or technology needed to manufacture goods.

- If their product is highly differentiated.

- If there are many buyers and none make up significant portions of sales.

- If there are no substitutes available.

- If there are strong end users who can exert power over the organization in favor of a supplier (This can be the case in labor situations).

In all of these cases, the bargaining power of suppliers is high to demand premium prices and set their own timelines.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Explanation

Functional benchmarking is a comparison to similar or identical practices (e.g., the picking process for assembling customer orders, maintaining inventory controls of spare computer parts, logistics to move operational forces, etc.) within the same or similar functions outside the immediate industry. Functional benchmarking might identify practices that are superior in your functional areas in whatever industry they may exist. Functional benchmarking would be accomplished at the federal level by comparing the IRS collections process against those of American Express. Comparing copper mining techniques to coal mining techniques is an example in the private sector.

Benefits

- Provides industry trend information

- Quantitative comparisons

- Better improvement rate

Challenges

- Diverse corporate cultures

- Great need for specificity

- Not invented here. syndrome

- Common functions can be difficult to find

- Takes more time than internal or percent

- Must be able to visualize how to adapt the best practices

Source: USN Benchmarking Handbook

LO 1, AC 1.3

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2: Supply Market Analysis)

Supplier power is high when:

Few suppliers exist relative to demand → less competition.

Urgent demand gives suppliers leverage over buyers.

A and D would reduce supplier power; C (educated buyer) also weakens it.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 Sections:

Porter’s Five Forces – supplier power

Market structure and urgency as power drivers

Detailed Explanation:

When the buyer does not align with the supplier’s strategic interests, the supplier may take advantage by charging higher prices to compensate for the perceived lack of value. This approach maximizes the supplier’s benefit from a transactional relationship. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Supplier Engagement and Negotiation Strategies.

Explanation

Acceptance testing, in the context of the engineering and software industries, is a functional trial performed on a product or prototype before it is put on the market or delivered, to decide whether the specifications or contract have been met. It also makes sure the quality and design of the product meet both contractual and regulatory obligations in terms of functionality, usability, durability, and safety.

If a product is found to be unacceptable at this stage, it can be sent back for modification, debug-ging, repair, or re-design before it can become a costly undertaking for the producer, as would be the case in a product recall.

Explanation

To answer this question, candidates are required to remember the cash flow cycle and cost entries as well as the impact of their timing on a business.

Diagram Description automatically generated

Source: https://cfoperspective.com/free-your-cash-trapped-in-the-cash-conversion-cycle/

Shorter payment term and more inventory are likely to have negative impact on the cash flow be-cause the buyer has to pay sooner and greater.

"Customers agree to pay immediately" will increase the organisation's bank account sooner.

Depreciation has no impact on cash flow as it is only listed in Profit and Loss statement.

Increasing revenue may have negative or positive impact on cash flow, depending on the real situation.

Explanation

Public annual reports can be a source of information that helps the procurement professional to analyse an industry's cost and revenue using the line of best fit. Line of best fit is one of the most important outputs of regression analysis. Regression refers to a quantitative measure of the relationship between one or more independent variables and a resulting dependent variable. Regression is of use to professionals in a wide range of fields from science and public service to financial analysis.

In this case, by collecting and analysing 17 annual reports, the procurement manager can find the line of best fit which goes approximately through the middle of the data points with an equal num-ber of data points above and below it.

The slope of the line of best fit is the approximate variable costs the industry. The easiest way to calculate it is to take a point at the right-hand end of the line of best fit and note its cost and output levels. Divide the cost by the output and this gives and approximate figure for the cost per unit of output or variable cost. This gives an approximate value for the industry fixed and variable costs.

Explanation

The following are typical social criteria in procurement:

• Reducing unemployment

• Preventing the use of child labour

• Preventing discrimination on the grounds of race, religion, disability, sex or sexual orientation

• Encouraging good employment practice

• Reducing local unemployment

• Reducing social exclusion

• Promoting training opportunities for the young or disadvantaged

• Encouraging access to work for people with disabilities

Explanation

Barriers to entry is an economics and business term describing factors that can prevent or impede newcomers into a market or industry sector, and so limit competition. The most obvious barriers to entry are high start-up costs and regulatory hurdles which include the need for new companies to obtain licenses or regulatory clearance before operation. Also, industries heavily regulated by the government are usually the most difficult to penetrate. Other forms of barrier to entry that prevent new competitors from easily entering a business sector include special tax benefits to existing firms, patent protections, strong brand identity, customer loyalty, and high customer switching costs.

In the scenario, the new factory for chipset manufacturing costs billions of dollars, which indicates high set-up costs. Also, the incumbent manufacturers have reached economies of scale, allowing them to produce the components at optimal price.

The above descriptions are compiled from recent reports on current chip shortage (2021).

Explanation

In marketing, a customer value proposition (CVP) consists of the sum total of benefits which a vendor promises a customer will receive in return for the customer's associated payment (or other value-transfer).

Value analysis is concerned with existing products. It involves a current product being analysed and evaluated by a team, to reduce costs, improve product function or both. Value Analysis exercises use a plan which step-by-step, methodically evaluates the product in a range of areas. These include costs, function, alternative components and design aspects such as ease of manufacture and assembly.

Value engineering is concerned with new products. It is applied during product development. The focus is on reducing costs, improving function or both, by way of teamwork-based product evalua-tion and analysis. This takes place before any capital is invested in tooling, plant or equipment.

In this scenario, the company's objective is cost reduction, then value analysis or value engineering is more likely to be applied. The products are existing, so value analysis is the best option.

LO 3, AC 3.4

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

CIPS L4M2 defines fixed costs as those that do not change in total with small changes in the level of activity within a relevant range (for example, rent, insurance, basic utilities standing charges).

Premises costs (C) – such as rent and building insurance, are typically fixed: they are paid regardless of production volume (within normal operating levels).

Utilities costs (D) – often treated as fixed or semi-fixed in exam-style questions: the organisation pays standing charges and must maintain services regardless of output.

In contrast:

Staff overtime (A) – varies with workload; this is a variable cost.

Sales commission (B) – depends on sales volume, so it is variable.

Materials costs (E) – directly linked to output (more units = more materials), so variable.

Understanding fixed versus variable costs is vital when preparing a business case (e.g. break-even, sensitivity analysis, and assessing the impact of demand changes).

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Cost behaviour: fixed, variable, semi-variable

The role of cost analysis in business cases and sourcing decisions

Overhead allocation and cost structures

Explanation

Copious amounts of waste can occur in the workplace, particularly in a manufacturing process, but do you know what the eight most commons wastes are and how they impact your organization?

Taiichi Ohno, considered the father of Toyota Production System, created a lean manufacturing framework, which was based on the idea of preserving (or increasing) value with less work. Any-thing that doesn't increase value in the eye of the customer must be considered waste, or "Muda", and every effort should be made to eliminate that waste. The following 8 lean manufacturing wastes, mostly derived from the TPS, have a universal application to businesses today. The acro-nym for the eight wastes is DOWNTIME. Downtime stands for:

- Defects

- Overproduction

- Waiting

- Not utilizing talent

- Transportation

- Inventory excess

- Motion waste

- Excess processing

OWN-IT is the acronym for the process of collecting and analysing the data and information needed in any field

SCAMPER is acronym for options addressing the underlying issues and achieving target

VA/VE is value analysis and value engineering

LO 3, AC 3.4

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

CIPS L4M2 warns against over-specification – defining requirements in more detail, higher quality, or tighter tolerances than are actually needed. Key consequences include:

Increased costs – suppliers incur higher production and quality costs, which are passed on to the buyer.

Fewer potential suppliers – only a small number can meet the demanding specification.

More complex supplier relationships – closer collaboration and management may be needed to meet the demanding spec.

Assessing each statement:

Ineffective SLA – if the specification is unnecessarily detailed or unrealistic, SLAs can become difficult to meet, overly complex, or focused on the wrong priorities. Likely outcome.

Higher supplier costs – very clearly a result of over-specification (tight tolerances, special materials, complex processes).

Increased SRM – when the requirement is demanding and fewer suppliers can comply, buyers often need more intensive SRM to manage performance and risk.

Reduced inventory costs – this is not a typical outcome of over-specification; if anything, higher unit costs and longer lead times can increase inventory risks and carrying costs.

Thus 1, 2 and 3 are in line with CIPS treatment of over-specification; 4 is not, so:

Correct option: C (1, 2 and 3 only)

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Dangers of over-specification (cost, risk, supplier base)

Service Level Agreements and realistic performance measures

The role of SRM in managing complex or high-dependency suppliers

Explanation

The term product life cycle refers to the length of time a product is introduced to consumers into the market until it's removed from the shelves. The life cycle of a product is broken into four stages—introduction, growth, maturity, and decline.

Chart, line chart Description automatically generated

Source: https://blueoceanoutsource.co.ke/the-product-life-cycle-concept/

At maturity stage, price competition sets in as more and more supply capacity has been added by new entrants, then the competition will be the most intense.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Specification Improvement and Value Techniques)

Value engineering (VE) is a systematic review process used to improve the function-to-cost ratio of a product.

It involves:

Analysing functions, processes, and costs,

Eliminating unnecessary costs without reducing functionality.

Value analysis is similar but applies to existing products; VE is used for design/redesign, improving specifications.

CIPS often treats this scenario (improving an existing specification using function-cost analysis) under the VE approach, since the purpose is to optimise future performance.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Value analysis and value engineering techniques”

“Improving specifications through value review”

Explanation

The scenario is very long with many distracting data. Students need to read carefully and use their experience to solve this problem.

The company is developing a new component which requires different type of material. But this component will not be available for mass production in 1.5 years. This means the company still needs to produce the current components with current materials until the development is finished. They must continue purchase the materials from current supplier through call-off orders. This situation is an example of straight re-buy.

Detailed Explanation:

Price comparison websites are secondary sources as they aggregate data collected from multiple suppliers. Primary sources (like RFQs and brochures) come directly from the supplier. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Market Data Analysis.

Detailed Explanation:

Given that the provision for 'risk for additional resource' exists and this is the first occurrence, James should reject the price increase as the supplier should account for these risks in their pricing. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Contract Management and Cost Control.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Market Power and Negotiation Leverage)

Buyer power increases when the buyer has more supply alternatives and can switch easily.

A high number of suppliers fosters competition, giving the buyer stronger leverage.

Options B–D limit choice and increase supplier power.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Factors increasing buyer power”

“Supplier competition and negotiation advantage”

Explanation

Value Engineering (VE) is concerned with new products. It is applied during product development. The focus is on reducing costs, improving function or both, by way of teamwork-based product evaluation and analysis. This takes place before any capital is invested in tooling, plant or equipment.

This is very significant, because according to many reports, up to 80% of a product’s costs (throughout the rest of its life-cycle), are locked in at the design development stage. This is under-standable when you consider the design of any product determines many factors, such as tooling, plant and equipment, labour and skills, training costs, materials, shipping, installation, maintenance, as well as decommissioning and recycle costs.

The Kano model is a theory for product development and customer satisfaction developed in the 1980s by Professor Noriaki Kano, which classifies customer preferences into five categories. Both Kano model and Value Engineering aims at optimising new product, so they can be combined to-gether. CIPS L4M2 study guide consider Kano model is a tool of Value Engineering

Example of Kano model (source: Wikipedia)

Explanation

Value Engineering (VE) is concerned with new products. It is applied during product development. The focus is on reducing costs, improving function or both, by way of teamwork-based product evaluation and analysis. This takes place before any capital is invested in tooling, plant or equipment.

This is very significant, because according to many reports, up to 80% of a product’s costs (throughout the rest of its life-cycle), are locked in at the design development stage. This is under-standable when you consider the design of any product determines many factors, such as tooling, plant and equipment, labour and skills, training costs, materials, shipping, installation, maintenance, as well as decommissioning and recycle costs.

LO 3, AC 3.4

Explanation

Cracks on the jet engine is a closed-end problem. A typical problem solving process has 8 steps:

Step 1: Define the Problem

- What is the problem?

- How did you discover the problem?

- When did the problem start and how long has this problem been going on?

- Is there enough data available to contain the problem and prevent it from getting passed to the next process step? If yes, contain the problem.

Step 2: Clarify the Problem

- What data is available or needed to help clarify, or fully understand the problem?

- Is it a top priority to resolve the problem at this point in time?

- Are additional resources required to clarify the problem? If yes, elevate the problem to your leader to help locate the right resources and form a team.

- Consider a Lean Event (Do-it, Burst, RPI, Project).

- Ensure the problem is contained and does not get passed to the next process step.

Step 3: Define the Goals

- What is your end goal or desired future state?

- What will you accomplish if you fix this problem?

- What is the desired timeline for solving this problem?

Step 4: Identify Root Cause of the Problem

- Identify possible causes of the problem.

- Prioritize possible root causes of the problem.

- What information or data is there to validate the root cause?

Step 5: Develop Action Plan

- Generate a list of actions required to address the root cause and prevent problem from getting to others.

- Assign an owner and timeline to each action.

- Status actions to ensure completion.

Step 6: Execute Action Plan

- Implement action plan to address the root cause.

- Verify actions are completed.

Step 7: Evaluate the Results

- Monitor and Collect Data.

- Did you meet your goals defined in step 3? If not, repeate th 8-Step Process.

- Were there any unforeseen consequences?

- If problem is resolved, remove activities that were added previously to contain the problem.

Step 8: Continuously Improve

- Look for additional opportunities to implement solution.

- Ensure problem will not come back and communicate lessons learned.

- If needed, repeat the 8-Step Problem Solving Process to drive further improvements.

ANA has already known what is going on, the next step they should adopt is collecting more infor-mation on the problem. If the airline is hurry to the solution, it may choose 'Generate options ad-dressing the issue'. The crack on turbine blade can be welded, or the airline replaces a new blade. However, jumping to solution without knowing the root cause does not completely solve the prob-lem. The root cause is unaddressed, then it may occur in the future. Therefore, the airline should still collect information to find the root cause, then remove it.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Sustainable Specification Writing)

Environmental criteria address resource use, pollution, waste, and emissions.

For machinery, specifying maximum emission limits or energy efficiency ratings ensures sustainability compliance.

Brand, location, or supplier nationality are not environmental factors.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Environmental sustainability criteria in technical specifications”

“Life cycle environmental performance”

Detailed Explanation:

An output specification defines the desired outcome or result of the procurement rather than specifying how the result should be achieved. A requirements brief outlines the goals, leaving flexibility for the supplier to propose solutions. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Output Specifications in Procurement.

Explanation

The hospital is buying too many product variants. This may cause bottleneck in its operation and increase operational expense. So procurement manager suggests to standardise products.

This is an example of the benefits of product standardisation:

Saint Thomas Health, a system of 5 hospitals, needed to find a way to reduce costs. They were purchasing different SKUs for products that were very similar, in this case, labels. They bought label rolls for $3 and a very similar product for $1. This oversight in product purchases impacted the overall costs of the system. After partnering with a sole source vendor it was able to save $200,000 over a four year span. They accomplished this simply by standardizing label products. These savings, however, only account for the immediate savings from standardizing products. The saving that are not factored into that number are the savings from soft or hidden costs.

On a national scale, hospitals lose millions of dollars per year in hidden expenses due to missed opportunities for cost containment and incorporation. Some of the hidden elements that increase overall costs for a healthcare provider include the following:

- Redundant purchasing

- Freight

- Excessive purchase orders

- Multiple vendor relations

- Low efficiency

- Joint commission fines

- HAI

By implementing product standardization, hospitals and health systems reduce vendors, are able to reduce SKUs, purchase orders, inefficiency, freight costs, fines, and off-contract spending. All of this adds up to large savings for the organization as a whole.

96% of the respondents in the survey agree that consolidating suppliers and standardizing product purchases across organization would reduce hidden costs.

Explanation

Design specification is a detailed document providing a list of points regarding a product or pro-cess. For example, the design specification could include required dimensions, environmental fac-tors, ergonomic factors, aesthetic factors, maintenance that will be needed, etc. It may also give specific examples of how the design should be executed, helping others work properly (a guideline for what the person should do).

Performance specification is written requirement that describes the functional performance criteria required for a particular equipment, material, or product.

Tolerance is the permissable limit of a variable used to define a product

Statement of work is the document that captures and defines all aspects of a project, including the activities, deliverables and the timetable for the project.

Explanation

Internet is a great source of information, however, information from the Internet needs to be tested for accuracy and reliability. To check the information from the Internet, a buyer can use the criteria with acronym SAMOA:

Source (of the information)

Audience (intended as the recipient of the information)

Methodology (used to collect and analyse the data)

Objectivity (of the information - there should be no bias)

Accuracy

Explanation

As you can see from the scenario, ABC Group is developing the new product. It might be using value engineering. The latter sentences confirm this: the cross-functional team in ABC is mapping the functions and surveying the customers. Their method is known as Kano model.

Explanation

Products used in agriculture can be subject to shortage due to natural disasters.

Explanation

Open-ended problem is something stopping the achievement of an objective or blocking progress. To solve this type of problems, procurement professional should find a way to unblock the block-age. In the above question, high logistics cost is an obstacle to cost cutting objective while suppli-er’s incompliance prevents the company to achieve its sustainable objective.

Explanation

Before a project commences (either capital purchase or switching to a new supplier), a business case should be developed. The business case outlines the why, what, how, and who necessary to decide if it is worthwhile continuing a project.

Basically, the following criteria can be applied to the assessment of a business case:

1. Objectives

This part describes why you are doing the project. The business objective answers the following questions:

- What is your goal?

- What is needed to overcome the problem?

- How will the project support the business strategy?

2. Option identification and selection

Identify the potential solutions to the problem and describe them in enough detail for the reader to understand.

For instance, if the business case and proposed solution makes use of technology, make sure to explain how the technology is used and define the terms used in a glossary. Since most problems have multiple solutions an option appraisal is often needed. This will explore the potential solutions and recommend the best option.

When writing the initial business case the option appraisal is likely to contain a long list of options and will cover many possibilities. As the project continues a number of options will be rejected. The final business case may contain three to five options ― the short list ― that includes a do nothing or benchmark option.

3. Benefits and limitations

The benefits and limitations section describes the financial and non-financial benefits in turn. The purpose is to explain why you need a project.

For instance, to:

- Improve quality

- Save costs through efficiencies

- Reduce working capital

- Generate revenue

- Remain competitive

- Improve customer service

- Align to corporate strategy

The business case should also include any limitations since these present potential risk to the pro-ject.

4. Risk management

The risk assessment summarizes the significant project risks and opportunities and how they are managed. The risks included should cover those that could arise from your project or the organiza-tion’s ability to deliver change.

This section answers the following questions:

- What risks are involved?

- What are the consequences of a risk happening?

- What opportunities may emerge?

- What plans are in place to deal with the risks?

- Every project should include a risk log.

When writing a business case, make sure this is included as it explains how risk and opportunity are managed.

5. Implementation plan

The outline plan provides a summary of the main activities and overall timescale ― project schedule ― for the project.

Ideally, the project should be divided into stages with key decisions preceding each stage. Use this section to answer the following questions:

- What is required?

- How is it done?

- Who does what?

- When will things happen?

This outline plan lists the major deliverables and includes a brief project description plus accountabilities for each activity.

In the scenario, the CPO has set out objective, generated options, cost and benefit of each option and implementation plan. In order to make the business case more compelling, he should reinforce it with risk management.

Explanation

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a method to transform qualitative user demands into quantitative parameters, to deploy the functions forming quality, and to deploy methods for achieving the design quality into subsystems and component parts, and ultimately to specific elements of the manufacturing process.

Kano model of excitement and basic quality (Kano et al, 1984; Berger et al, 1993; Matzler et al, 1996) brings a different perspective for the analysis of improvement opportunities in products and services because it takes in consideration the asymmetrical and non-linear relationship between performance and satisfaction. The Kano model classifies customers requirements in five categories: basic requirements, performance requirements, attractive requirements, indifferent requirements and reverse requirements.

Mendelow’s Matrix is a tool that may be used by an organisation to consider the attitude of their stakeholders at the start of a project or when they are setting out strategic objectives.

The Thomas Kilmann model identifies two dimensions when choosing a course of action in a con-flict situation, these are assertiveness and cooperativeness. Assertiveness is the degree to which you try to satisfy your own needs. Cooperativeness is the degree to which you try to satisfy the other person’s concerns.

Explanation

Risk control is the process by which an organization reduces the likelihood of a risk event occurring or mitigates the effects that risk should it occur. CIPS preferred way to determine your risk control strategy is to use the four T’s Process:

Transferring Risk can be achieved through the use of various forms of insurance, or the payment to third parties who are prepared to take the risk on behalf of the organization

Tolerating Risk is where no action is taken to mitigate or reduce a risk. This may be because the cost of instituting risk reduction or mitigation activity is not cost-effective or the risks of impact are at so low that they are deemed acceptable to the business. Even when these risks are tolerated they should be monitored because future changes may make it no longer tolerable.

Treating Risk is a method of controlling risk through actions that reduce the likelihood of the risk occurring or minimize its impact prior to its occurrence. Also, there are contingent measures that can be developed to reduce the impact of an event once it has occurred. Finding an alternative sup-plier is an example of treating the risk.

Terminating Risk is the simplest and most often ignored method of dealing with risk. It is the ap-proach that should be most favored where possible and simply involves risk elimination. This can be done by altering an inherently risky process or practice to remove the risk. The same can be used when reviewing practices and processes in all areas of the business.

If an item presents a risk and can be changed or removed without it materially affecting the busi-ness, then removing the risk should be the first option considered; rather than attempting the treat, tolerate or transfer it.

Explanation

One product substitutes for another if it offers buyers an inducement to switch that exceeds the cost or overcomes the resistance to doing so. A substitute offers an inducement to switch if the substitute provides the buyer with more value relative to its price than the product currently being used. There is always some cost of switching to a substitute because of the disruption and potential reconfiguration of buyer activities that must result, however. The threat of a substitute will vary depending on the size of the inducement relative to the required switching costs.

In addition to relative value to price and switching cost, the pattern of substitution is influenced by what I term the buyer’s propensity to switch. Faced with equivalent economic inducements for substitution, different buyers will often evaluate substitution differently. The threat of substitution, then, is a function of three factors:

• The relative value/ price of a substitute compared to an industry’s product

• The cost of switching to the substitute

• The buyer’s propensity to switch

Porter, Michael E.. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance (p. 278). Free Press. Kindle Edition.

The price-to-book ratio compares a company's market value to its book value. The market value of a company is its share price multiplied by the number of outstanding shares. The book value is the net assets of a company.

The price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its earnings per share (EPS). The price-to-earnings ratio is also sometimes known as the price multiple or the earnings multiple.

The reserve ratio is the portion of reservable liabilities that commercial banks must hold onto, rather than lend out or invest. This is a requirement determined by the country's central bank, which in the United States is the Federal Reserve. It is also known as the cash reserve ratio.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2: Specification and Buying Situations)

CIPS identifies three main buying types:

Straight re-buy – same product, same conditions.

Modified re-buy – some aspects changed (e.g. packaging, quantity, or delivery).

New buy – first-time purchase.

Since the product is the same but the packaging is changed, it fits modified re-buy.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 Sections:

Buying situations and procurement complexity

Modified re-buy examples

Explanation

In this question, you have to calculate price variance and quantity variance.

Last month, 1 tonne of steel costed $216. This month, the price decreases to $181.1. Price variance = (P1 - P2)*Q2 = ($216-$181.1)*11 = $383.9

Quantity variance = (Q1-Q2)*P1 = -$216

Price variance is greater than quantity variance, therefore, price variance is the main cost driver.

LO 1, AC 1.4