L4M5 Sample Questions Answers

Negotiating in the supplier's environment (their site) can unintentionally shift the power dynamic. The supplier may gain apsychological edgedue to the comfort and control of their surroundings. Best practice recommends holding negotiations in aneutral settingto ensure balance and reduce any influence based on physical context. While site visits are beneficial for supplier evaluation, they should beseparate from the negotiationto maintain objectivity.

There are many factors that can influence the balance of power in a negotiation. These factors are classified into 3 levels:

- Macro level: STEEPLE framework: social, technological, economic, environment, political, legal and ethical

- Micro level: Porter's five forces:

Diagram Description automatically generated

- One-to-one buyer-supplier dynamics.

The question asks about the micro factors that increases buyer's bargaining power. Among 5 answers, only 2 are likely to increase buyer's power:

- JCB's switching costs are low: Buyer may easily switch its suppliers anytime

- These components are highly standardised: The products are not different any more, buyer may choose to buy from any supplier available.

Other answers cannot be correct because:

- Suppliers are more concentrated than buyer: Suppliers are forming oligopoly market, their bargaining power tend to be greater.

- Eruption of epidemic in supply market: this is a macro factor. Eruption of epidemic may cause factories closed and disruptions on supply chain.

- Buyers purchase in small volumes: Buyer will be seen as less potential to suppliers. Buying organisation may have difficulties to deal better price with suppliers.

LO 1, AC 1.3

The relationship spectrum categorizes supplier relationships based on factors like strategic importance, allowing organizations to tailor their approach to each supplier relationship. CIPS emphasizes the relationship spectrum as a valuable tool for assessing and managing supplier interactions based on strategic relevance.

Using threats is generally inappropriate in strategic supplier negotiations where a long-term, trust-based relationship is required (C). Threatening tactics can damage the relationship and may result in resistance from the supplier. CIPS advocates for collaborative approaches in strategic relationships to foster mutual trust and achieve sustainable agreements.

Fixed costs are regular, predictable charges that do not vary directly with usage or demand. Monthly cleaning services are typically charged at a fixed, recurring rate, making them a clear example of a fixed cost that can be renegotiated to achieve savings. Fuel costs and reactive maintenance vary with activity levels, while inflation indexation is a pricing mechanism rather than a cost itself. CIPS advises buyers to focus on fixed-cost elements when seeking sustainable cost reductions, as changes deliver predictable and ongoing savings.

Contribution = Price - Variable cost

Break-even point (volume) = Fixed cost/Contribution

In order to estimate the gap and the progress towards desired level of support, a stakeholder support scale can be used by the procurement internally. The support level scale measures stakeholder commitment. Current support level for the procurement/negotiation objectives should be gained from engagement with key stakeholders. The following is an example of stakeholder support level scale:

LO 1, AC 1.1

In most commercial negotiations with monopolistic organisations, one can expect that in general they will have far greater bargaining power - you will need them more than they need you. There BATNA is stronger in the short run, but over time their power can be challenged effectively.

Ways of dealing with monopoly suppliers include the following:

Making yourself an attractive buyer

Seeking out alternatives / substitutes in a private or public manner

Designing out the requirement that forces you to go to the monopoly suppliers, or seek to make the product, or threaten to make it yourself if feasible

Lobbying government or campaigning, as part of an industry or trade body, for a reduction in barriers to entry that support the monopoly

Connected stakeholders are those who, by contractual or commercial relationships, have a significant stake in organisation activity. As a general rule, connected stakeholder (with the exception of suppliers) have a low level of influence on procurement negotiations.

Examples of connected stakeholders are: suppliers, customers, bank where the organisation opens its account, shareholders.

A win-win (integrative) negotiation focuses on shared interests and joint value creation. The first step is identifying where both parties’ interests align, followed by designing creative options that allow both sides to gain more of what they need. Limiting resources and imposing subjective standards are characteristics of distributive or adversarial approaches and restrict value creation. CIPS clearly distinguishes integrative negotiation as collaborative, interest-based, and solution-focused, particularly suitable for long-term and strategic supplier relationships.

In the opening phase, parties should confirm understanding and get the issues on the table.

The testing phase is an information gathering stage where the hypothesis and assumption you have made in the planning stage can be tested or confirmed or disproved.

Opening questions (those that start with 'what', 'how', 'why') are used at the opening and testing stages to uncover needs and underlying motives, and to allow the buyer to get a feel of what is in store in the negotiation.

Probing questions are also useful to check that the supplier fully understand their offering, as well as your needs, and can also be used to communicate to the supplier that you know this category well. These questions are typically useful at the opening and testing stages.

The collaborative strategy (win-win, integrative) focuses on joint problem-solving, transparency, and trust. It is best when long-term relationships are critical, and both parties see value in mutual success. By contrast, competitive (win-lose) is adversarial, accommodative sacrifices one party’s interests, and avoidance seeks disengagement. Collaborative strategies are common in partnerships, innovation projects, and sustainable procurement. They require sharing information, identifying tradeables, and aligning objectives beyond price to long-term outcomes.

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are multiple variables to consider when choosing between 'push' and 'pull'. Professor Fiona Dent of Ashridge Business School proposes situations when each style might be most appropriate, breaking down push into 'directive' and 'reasoning' and 'pull' into 'collaborative' and 'visionary':

Table Description automatically generated

In the scenario, Rose intends to let both parties exchange their views and ideas so that solutions to current problems can be found. This is the typical characteristic of collaborative (pull) method.

This statement reflects shared goals and mutual benefit, hallmarks of integrative negotiation. Unlike adversarial or distributive (win-lose) strategies, integrative approaches seek joint value and collaboration. The language of partnership (“we are in this together”) signals alignment and cooperative intent. Lose-lose outcomes, by contrast, occur when both sides compromise excessively or fail to reach creative solutions. Integrative strategies foster long-term partnerships where value is maximised for both.

The typical stages of commercial negotiation are Preparing, opening, bargaining, agreement, and closure. This sequence facilitates a structured approach where negotiators prepare strategies, initiate discussions, engage in bargaining, reach agreements, and formally close the negotiation. This structure is emphasized in CIPS materials as essential for achieving a balanced negotiation process.

Macroeconomic factors like inflation, interest rates, and currency fluctuations can significantly affect pricing and contractual terms. Buyers and suppliers must account for these factors during negotiations, particularly in long-term or high-value contracts.

Nonverbal communication is important because it gives us valuable information about a situation including how a person might be feeling, how someone receives information and how to approach a person or group of people.

There are several types of nonverbal communications you should be aware of, including:

1. Body language

Body language is the way someone situates their body naturally depending on the situation, the environment and how they are feeling.

Example: Someone might cross their arms if they are feeling angry or nervous.

2. Movement

The way you move your arms and legs such as walking quickly or slowly, standing, sitting or fidgeting, can all convey different messages to onlookers.

Example: Sitting still and paying attention in a meeting conveys respect and attention.

3. Posture

The way you sit or stand can also communicate your comfort level, professionalism and general disposition towards a person or conversation.

Example: Someone might slouch their shoulders if they feel tired, frustrated or disappointed.

4. Gestures

While gestures vary widely across communities, they are generally used both intentionally and unintentionally to convey information to others.

Example: Someone in the United States might display a “thumbs up” to communicate confirmation or that they feel positively about something.

5. Space

Creating or closing distance between yourself and the people around you can also convey messages about your comfort level, the importance of the conversation, your desire to support or connect with others and more.

Example: You might stand two to three feet away from a new contact to respect their boundaries.

6. Paralanguage:

Paralanguage includes the non-language elements of speech, such as your talking speed, pitch, intonation, volume and more.

Example: You might speak quickly if you are excited about something.

7. Facial expressions

One of the most common forms of nonverbal communication is facial expressions. Using the eyebrows, mouth, eyes and facial muscles to convey can be very effective when communicating both emotion and information.

Example: Someone might raise their eyebrows and open their eyes widely if they feel surprised.

8. Eye contact

Strategically using eye content (or lack of eye contact) is an extremely effective way to communicate your attention and interest.

Example: Looking away from someone and at the ground or your phone may convey disinterest or disrespect.

9. Touch

Some people also use touch as a form of communication. Most commonly, it is used to communicate support or comfort. This form of communication should be used sparingly and only when you know the receiving party is okay with it. It should never be used to convey anger, frustration or any other negative emotions.

Example: Placing your hand on a friend’s shoulder may convey support or empathy.

Fixed price contract is the contract in which the price is static throughout the contract period. A fixed-price contract may give certainty to budget and simplify contract management. However, it may lead to other problems since it requires bidders to estimate and bear the financial risks associated with price escalations. If the estimates are too high or events do not materialize, the buyer will pay a steep price that may affect the economy and efficiency of the contract. In the worst case, it may mean that the bid price is then above budget and may lead to a reduction in the requirements or rebidding. If the estimates are too low, it may appear as an abnormally low bid and disrupt contract execution.

On the other hand, price adjustment provisions include formulas designed to address problems, and can protect both the borrower and contractors from price fluctuations. Price adjustment formulas allow contractors to offer more realistic prices at the time of bidding. Despite concerns that they may lead to budget uncertainties, price adjustment formulas will estimate the actual cost implications that will be encountered. They use indexes that can be used for cost projection.

According to Asia Development Bank (ADB), any contract with a delivery or completion period beyond 18 months should contain an appropriate price adjustment clause.

In the scenario, the crude oil contract is planned to last 36 months. This period is pretty long with a fluctuating commodity. Therefore, the company should use price adjustment agreement.

Buying organisation may increase its leverage with suppliers by concentrating spend. Supplier spend consolidation can take many forms as outlined below:

Vendor base reduction: straightforward reduction of number of suppliers in any category

Volume pooling: pooling cross organisational requirement until your order volume is high enough to attract new bidders/additional discounts

Volume redistribution: making recommendations following spend analysis to move from one supplier to another

Volume consolidation across categories: certain purchase requirements may be common across a number of categories

Standardisation and harmonisation of specifications: analysis of specifications and standards for a high spend purchased input, may show that there is a little difference between them and that the specification can be standardised or at least harmonised across the group or across national, regional or global operations.

Forming purchasing consortia: buyers may decide to come together and combine their purchase volumes to attract better deals.

Published market indices are a source of macroeconomic data, as they reflect broader economic trends and provide insights into the overall market environment, which is essential for globalexpansion planning. Macroeconomic analysis focuses on high-level economic indicators, as recommended in CIPS’s guidelines on sourcing macroeconomic data.

The earlier procurement get involved in the procurement processes, the better. If procurement are involved in design at the specification stage they can feed in prices and costs to designer so they know the likely budget implication of choices made. Sending in a procurement team to negotiate at or close to the end of the procurement process effectively ties their hands and limits their negotiation leverage. This is illustrated in the graph below:

Chart Description automatically generated

LO 2, AC 2.1

Below are some examples of cost input that can be analysed in PPCA process:

- Material costs

- Process and labour costs

- Employment costs

- Overhead costs

- Distribution costs

- Depreciation on equipment

- Profit

If you want to learn more on PPCA, you can study from OGC document here: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100609100650/www.ogc.gov.uk/documents/Cost_Price_analysis(1).pdf

LO 2, AC 2.1

Planning and preparation involve analysing bargaining power, understanding the counterpart’s needs, and defining the constituents (parties involved). Questioning and concessions come later during bargaining. Narrowing solutions occurs during closure. Proper planning ensures negotiators enter with clear objectives, strategies, and knowledge, reducing surprises. CIPS highlights preparation as the most critical determinant of negotiation success, aligning with the saying: “Failing to prepare is preparing to fail.”

There are many factors that can influence the balance of power in a negotiation. These factors are classified into 3 levels:

Macro level: STEEPLE framework: social, technological, economic, environment, political, legal and ethical

Micro level: Porter's five forces:

Diagram Description automatically generated

One-to-one buyer-supplier dynamics.

The question asks about the micro factors that increases supplier's bargaining power. Among 5 answers, only 2 are likely to increase buyer's power:

There are no close substitutes for rubber: the buyer has to buy rubber, not any other material.

Costs of changing suppliers are high: buyer entails a large barrier if they want to switch supplier.

Other answers cannot be correct because:

SRI sets up its own rubber plantation: Buyer secures its own supply

SRI's purchase amount makes significant proportion of supplier revenue: Suppliers are reliant on buyer. If the buyer stops buying from them, they can face serious cash flow problems

Rubber from different suppliers is virtually similar: undifferentiated product would shift the power balance towards buyer.

Hammad’s approach of presenting facts, figures, and justifications aligns with the Push persuasion method. The Push strategy involves directly presenting information, data, and logical arguments to convince the other party of a certain outcome. In this scenario, Hammad is using objective evidence to influence the supplier towards agreeing to a discount, which is characteristic of the Push method, as per CIPS guidance on negotiation tactics.

In MIL planning, “Musts” are non-negotiable requirements (policy, law, mandatory standards). Ethical/sustainable procurement is typically a policy/legislative compliance requirement, so it belongs in Must; “Intend/Like” cover important and desirable aims respectively.

The opening stage of the negotiation covers the very first few minutes when the parties meet and greet each other and are seated in the negotiation room in preparation for the main event.

Typical behaviours at the opening stage: 'dos' and 'don'ts'

Do’s

Be punctual and well presented (welcome their arrival)

Break the ice with small talks

Start the conditioning process

Check authority

Check agenda

Consider using visual aid to set out key objectives or make key points

Don’ts

Use strong, pushy, cold or tough style at the opening

Put down marker at this stage

Criticise other organisations/TOP's previous contacts/third parties.

In this scenario, Diana has made her proposal right at the opening stage. This is an example of 'don'ts'. Good negotiators are very careful about 'red lines'. If she puts such barrier up too early, the supplier may not try to look for more creative solutions later in the negotiation.

Closed questions are effective for concluding negotiations, as they often elicit straightforward yes-or-no responses, helping to finalize terms and confirm agreement on specific points. This approach facilitates a clear and concise close to discussions, ensuring that both parties confirm their commitment to the agreed terms, as recommended by CIPS negotiation strategies.

At the first stage of CIPS Procurement and Supply Cycle (Understand need and develop a high-level specification), procurement professional mainly negotiate with internal stakeholders. They have a duty to proportionately and constructively challenge specification if there's genuine doubt over the need or how the need is expressed. This is called demand management. Their first duty is to the organisation's treasury, not to functional managers.

Demand management including: negotiation/challenge between procurement and internal stakeholders over the need/requirement/specification. Remember that in any process or product, the greatest opportunity for cost reduction is at the design stage.

Foreign exchange ratesdirectly influence thecost of imported goods and services. Currency fluctuations can affect total expenditure, supplier margins, and ultimately the buyer’s profitability. Even if payment is in local currency, suppliers may adjust their pricing to mitigate foreign exchange risks.

“Foreign exchange volatility can significantly impact pricing in international procurement. Buyers must assess currency risks as part of their cost evaluation and strategic preparation.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.2 - Macroeconomic Considerations in Pricing)

Direct costs are those costs of a product/service directly attributable/traceable to its production, for example, the costs of labour and materials directly used to produce the goods/services which the organisation sells.

The case in the question is illustrated as below:

The equilibrium price initially at P0 with quantity Q0, when supply curve shifts to the left, it will converge with demand curve at new equilibrium point with price P1 and quantity Q1. As you can see from the graph, P1 is greater than P0 and Q1 is smaller than Q0.

If the inflation rate is running high, then obtaining credit as a buyer is normally more difficult or expensive as money in the future will be worth less than money today.

In 1959, French and Raven described five bases of power:

1. Legitimate – This comes from the belief that a person has the formal right to make demands, and to expect others to be compliant and obedient.

2. Reward – This results from one person's ability to compensate another for compliance.

3. Expert – This is based on a person's high levels of skill and knowledge.

4. Referent – This is the result of a person's perceived attractiveness, worthiness and right to others' respect.

5. Coercive – This comes from the belief that a person can punish others for noncompliance.

Six years later, Raven added an extra power base:

6. Informational – This results from a person's ability to control the information that others need to accomplish something.

In the scenario, Neville attracts and keeps good relationship with his colleagues not because of neither position nor reward nor coercion. He has good skills and kindness, which increase his charisma. His source of power is referent power.

Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. When avoiding, an individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Knowing supplier's fixed and variable costs is beneficial for the buyer in a negotiation. With these insights, the buyer would know the volume at which the supplier reaches break-even points and then offers significant discount due to economies of scale.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Commercial negotiations commonly take place during Contract Management and Improvement (1) and Contract Award and Implementation (4) stages. During these stages:

Contract Management and Improvement (1): Ongoing negotiations may be required to adjust terms and conditions as part of managing the contract lifecycle.

Contract Award and Implementation (4): Initial negotiations finalize terms, setting the foundation for successful contract execution.

These stages are pivotal in ensuring both initial and ongoing alignment, as outlined in the CIPS Procurement Cycle.

A collaborative relationship is characterized by mutual commitment, which enhances risk management and strategic planning between buyer and supplier. High levels of trust and commitment enable both parties to work closely to achieve shared objectives, creating a beneficial negotiation environment. This approach aligns with CIPS’s principles of collaborative procurement relationships.

If driving greater value and efficiency from your supply base is your end, you should remember that there are many ways to do this without seeking to negotiate lower prices. Below are 7 types of saving levers:

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA) is the plan B or back-up plan in the event of a ‘walk away’. In case of no deal, buyer (or supplier) may switch to this option.

The zone of potential agreement (ZOPA) is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

STEEPLE offers an overview of various external fields. It is an acronym for Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal and Ethical.

PESTLE is a mnemonic which in its expanded form denotes P for Political, E for Economic, S for Social, T for Technological, L for Legal and E for Environmental. It gives a bird’s eye view of the whole environment from many different angles that one wants to check and keep a track of while contemplating on a certain idea/plan.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Under the European Union public procurement directives, all public sector bodies must abide by certain rules when they procure goods and services over a threshold value. These rules are codified under 5 procurement procedures:

1. Open Procedure

2. Restricted Procedure

3. Competitive Dialogue

4. Competitive Procedure with Negotiation

5. Innovation Partnerships.

Under normal circumstances, there is no commercial negotiation allowed under the two most commonly used procedure, Open and Restricted. Under these procedures, the prices and terms and conditions of contract should be decided via reference only to the tenderers' responses to the buyer's requests for tenders, and not through 'post-tender negotiation'. Under the other procedure, negotiation within the rules is permitted. Interested learners can read more about these procedures here.

LO 1, AC 1.1

BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) gives negotiators a fallback plan if discussions fail. It ensures they never accept worse terms than their minimum acceptable alternative. For Maria, developing a BATNA mitigates rejection risk, strengthens her bargaining power, and provides confidence. Without a BATNA, negotiators risk over-conceding or being locked into unfavourable deals. CIPS emphasises that BATNAs must be realistic, actionable, and aligned to organisational objectives—not merely theoretical alternatives.

Integrative negotiationfocuses onmutual gainand long-term collaboration. It seeks tomaximize joint outcomesand encourages parties to align interests andpursue shared goals. This contrasts with distributive tactics that prioritize individual wins and short-term gains.

“Integrative negotiations aim to create outcomes where both parties benefit. Shared problem-solving, information exchange, and joint goal pursuit are central features of this approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Principles of Integrative Negotiation)

Adversarial relationships typically lead to distributive (win–lose) negotiations, where each party seeks maximum gain at the other’s expense. Trust is low, information is withheld, and concessions are hard-fought. While it can deliver short-term wins, it risks damaging long-term relationships and may reduce overall value. Collaborative, integrative approaches are more sustainable, but adversarial conditions often prevent them. CIPS highlights the importance of recognising relationship dynamics before selecting negotiation style, as forcing integrative approaches in adversarial contexts may be unrealistic.

In a Win/Win or integrative negotiation approach, the goal is to achieve mutual benefit, which is characterized by a collaborative environment. According to CIPS principles on integrative negotiation:

Collaboration (A): Actively working together enables both parties to find solutions that maximize joint gains and address the needs of both sides.

Problem solving (B): Focusing on problem-solving allows both parties to address the issues at hand rather than competing over positions, facilitating a solution that satisfies both parties' needs.

By emphasizing collaboration and problem-solving, the organization increases the likelihood of a successful, sustainable agreement that respects both parties' interests.

Legitimate poweris derived from theposition or authorityheld within the organisation. It supports the buyer’s ability to influence negotiation outcomes based on formal responsibility, legal rights, or contractual mandates.

“Legitimate power stems from formal roles, authority or responsibility. It enables negotiators to assert terms backed by organisational policy or legal mandate.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.1 - Organisational Power Structures in Negotiation)

According to Thomas-Kilmann conflict model instrument, there are 5 conflict management styles:

In this scenario, the buyer's bargaining power is stronger than suppliers', and the relationship is transactional. Therefore, to get the most preferable outcome, the procurement professional can take an assertive approach, while he doesn't need to co-operate closely with these suppliers. Competing will be the most appropriate approach to negotiation in this scenario so that the buying organisation can get a better deal.

When a buyer’s purchase represents asignificant portion of a supplier’s revenue, it increases the buyer’s leverage. The supplier has a vested interest in maintaining the relationship and is more likely to make concessions to preserve the account.

“Buyer power increases when the buyer represents a large portion of the supplier's total sales. This dependency increases the buyer’s ability to influence terms.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.3 - Bargaining Power Analysis)

A probing question seeks deeper information, clarifying specifics beyond surface-level responses. Lina’s question is factual, detailed, and investigative — designed to uncover processes and commitments. Hypothetical questions test options (“what if…”), reflective restate or summarise to confirm understanding, and leading steer the respondent toward a desired answer. Probing is essential in negotiations to validate claims, identify risks, and build persuasive arguments.

Adversarial (win–lose) negotiation is viable when buyers can leverage abundant alternatives and substitutes, reducing supplier power. In such cases, buyers can adopt tough tactics, knowing they can switch suppliers if necessary. By contrast, limited supply, single sourcing, or monopolist suppliers constrain buyer power, making adversarial strategies risky and often ineffective. CIPS stresses that negotiation style must be matched to market conditions and the power balance.

The Win-Win approach is the most appropriate negotiation strategy in situations where collaboration and ongoing relationships are prioritized. In this case:

Achieving cost savings: The NHS aims to reduce expenses in order to reallocate funds to critical areas, making it essential that both parties work together to find cost-effective solutions.

Collaborative supplier relationship: Since Maria is working with a collaborative supplier, maintaining a positive relationship through mutual benefit is essential for continued cooperation.

Alignment with public service objectives: A Win-Win outcome aligns with the NHS's broader objectives of maximizing resources for patient care, as it ensures that savings are achieved without undermining the supplier’s commitment to quality service.

This approach aligns with CIPS guidelines for maintaining productive, ethical partnerships in procurement, especially in critical sectors like healthcare.

Listening involves both hearing (1) and interpreting (2) the information shared by the other party. Effective listening is an active process that goes beyond simply hearing words; it involvesinterpreting meaning, understanding the speaker’s intent, and responding accordingly. CIPS emphasizes these steps as part of effective communication in negotiations.

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Commercial situations often demand a distributive bargaining approach, if the 'pie' is inherently of a fixed size. In this case, any conflicts must be resolved by sharing it.

In win-lose approach, a negotiator wants to maximise the value obtained in a single deal, the relationship with the other party is not important. Therefore, a strong party may win more than 50% of the metaphorical 'pie'.

It should not be assumed that win-win can be applied to all commercial negotiations, or that win-lose approaches are inherently inferior.

The objective of the buyer here is to improve supplier cost structures over time, which requires them to have insight into supplier's current cost information. Purchase price cost analysis (PPCA) can help here. PPCA is a method for gathering, analysing and using price and cost information in a systematic way. The process allows the identification of future savings and opportunities to improve current costs.

STEEPLE analysis is used to analyse the macro environment that may have impact on an organisation.

Competitive rivalry is a part of Porter's Five Forces which is a tool for strategy making.

Volume concentration is a way to increase the purchasing quantities in order for a buying organisation to improve its leverage in negotiation.

Thebargaining stageis where both parties begin tomake concessionsand test options. This phase involves the use of strategic tactics, including the presentation of tradeables and adjustments in position to reach mutual agreement.

“The bargaining stage is characterised by movement, trade-offs, and deal-shaping. Tactics such as anchoring, making concessions, and introducing tradeables are employed to bridge the gap between opening offers.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.2 - Stages of the Negotiation Process)

All one-to-one commercial negotiations between a specific purchaser and a specific supplier take place within an industrial market and a larger business environment characterised by multiple forces which both parties typically have little control over. STEEPLE framework highlights the 6 main external influences on a business:

LO 1, AC 1.3

Trust-destroying behaviours:

- Rumours of partnership or relationship breaking down

- Emotion-based assessment of performance

- Avoiding accountability, passing the blame to others

- General mood – resentment, distrust, frustration, etc

LO 1, AC 1.4

Legitimate power in negotiation can arise from different sources:

Position power (authority from role/position in the organisation).

Referent power (influence from respect, charisma, or relationships).

MIL criteria indicate 3 limits that negotiator should establish:

M - Must achieve: minimum target/maximum you can concede on this point; the mandatory requirement or fall back position

I - Intend to achieve: realistic target you are aiming for on this point

L – Like to achieve: stretch target to achieve on this point.

PPCA is purchase cost analysis

TIMWOOD indicates 7 types of waste in Lean principles

The RAQSCI model is a mnemonic summary of a business model used to define and structure business requirements

In order to break vicious cycle of blame, procurement will need to use their negotiation and conflict management skills, adopting a collaborative and integrative approach. Your first action should be to establish the facts that led to the situation where the relationship broke down. Most day-to-day relationship between buying organisations and suppliers do not of course involve procurement staff, so you will need to consult with your business partners internally to establish their point of view of where the issue and sources of conflict are. You should also contact the supplier and get their side of the story - this is particularly to when you have previously identified the supplier as critical or otherwise important to your operations. Ideally you will be able to apply principled negotiation here, separating the people from the issue, focusing on interests and not positions, and then looking for options of mutual benefits.

Monopolistic competition exists in market where there are many competing producers but they will try to use product differentiation. Although their products may be very similar, their ability to differentiate means that they can act as monopolies in short run, irrespective of the actions of their competitors.

In perfect competition, there are no barriers to entry to the market or exit from the market. In monopolistic competition, there tend to be fewer barriers to entry or exit in these markets than inoligopolistic markets, but it doesn't mean that there are absolutely no barriers to entry in monopolistic competition.

In perfect competition, the demand curve is perfectly elastic, which means that it will be horizontal. Otherwise, in monopolistic competition market, the demand curve will have normal downward slope.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Involving an appropriate cross-functional team is beneficial for effective commercial negotiation because it brings together diverse perspectives and expertise relevant to the negotiation context. According to CIPS, a cross-functional team ensures that all aspects, such as technical, financial, and operational inputs, are considered, leading to more balanced and informed decision-making. This approach also helps in addressing complex negotiation elements effectively.

Win–lose strategies focus on gaining advantage at the other party’s expense. Forcing them to lower their resistance point or persuading them the deal is their best option are classic distributive tactics. Empathy, compromise, and creativity belong to integrative approaches aimed at mutual benefit. Recognising these distinctions ensures negotiators adopt the right strategy for the relationship type and context.

Direct costs are those costs that can be directly attributed to the production of specific goods or services. They typically include raw materials and labor directly involved in production. Metal used in the product is a raw material that becomes part of the final product, making it a direct cost.

Good negotiators are attuned to all stimuli and not just the verbal and written information exchanged. Tone of voice, body language, facial expressions and other clues from TOP are noticed, and with experience and knowledge, interpreted correctly. This interpretation may also involve knowledge of culture norms and values. A smile, a 'yes' and the type of hospitality received, (in the business context), can mean very different things in different international business cultures.

Trained negotiators will consider non-verbal communication (such as nodding and smiling) and body language as one source of signal from TOP, but will rarely rely wholly on this as a guide towhat TOP is thinking or feeling. Furthermore, international and regional cultural considerations must be included here to avoid errors in interpretation. Emotional intelligence also has an important role in forming a more holistic perspective of what TOP may be thinking or feeling.

Effective listening is crucial in integrative negotiations because it promotes understanding and collaboration. By actively listening, parties can identify shared interests and address concerns, which supports the goal of reaching mutually beneficial solutions. This is a key component in CIPS guidelines on successful integrative negotiation practices.

Mark-upis calculated as:

Mark-up %=(ProfitCost)×100\text{Mark-up \%} = \left( \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Cost}} \right) \times 100Mark-up %=(CostProfit​)×100

In this case:

Profit = $240 - $160 = $80

Cost = $160

Mark-up = (80 / 160) × 100 =50%

“Understanding mark-up percentages helps in assessing supplier pricing behaviour and negotiating realistic margins.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models and Profit Margins)

According to the book 'Influencing: Skills and techniques for business success' by Fiona Dent and Mike Brent, there are two major influencing styles. Push tends to be directive. It tells, and is clear and resolute, but needs to be employed in situations where firmness is required because of difficulties that exist or weakness is evident. Pull is more participatory and collaborative. It seeks to incorporate everyone’s perspective. It can appear wishy-washy if not skilfully employed. Thatapproach should be followed which is most likely to secure commitment and not mere compliance.

The two divisions can be further divided into four style categories: directive; persuasive reasoning; collaborative – team oriented, people oriented to inspire them with a vision. The directive style relies on your expertise and reputation being respected by others, and where there really does seem to be one answer. It is "I" driven whereas persuasive reasoning is more "we" and issue driven. Directive styles can make the user appear as "a bull in a china shop"; persuasive reasoning can be portrayed as tough guy.

Collaborative influencing takes the "we" element further and seeks to mobilise everyone’s ideas in a journey of discovery. It may have the flavour of "I’m your best friend", which may not go down too well. Visioning style is concerned to stir people’s emotions in support of achieving an objective. This last one has been used by demagogues to stir people’s hearts and minds for evil purposes as well as good.

A useful table offers the benefits, problems, words and body language associated with each style along with advice on when to use and when to avoid each. Cases and exercises illustrate these styles.

Empathy comes in for extended treatment with the definition of "standing in the other's shoes". This does not necessarily happen just intuitively, and therefore before a specific influencing effort there should be an intense effort to think about the other person or persons and to sense what it might feel like to be them – their hopes, fears, concerns, what turns them on, what turns them off, where are they coming from.

Accepting gifts during a negotiation can createconflict of interestconcerns and may violate ethical standards. Best practice requires rejecting such offers to maintain transparency and objectivity in decision-making.

Emotional intelligence involves the ability to recognize and manage one’s emotions and empathize with others. This skill allows negotiators to respond appropriately to both their own feelings and the emotional cues of the other party, fostering a more constructive and adaptive negotiation environment. CIPS highlights emotional intelligence as a valuable asset in understanding and influencing negotiation dynamics.

Delivering on commitments is fundamental to building high-trust relationships. When an organization reliably fulfills its promises, it reinforces the supplier’s confidence in the partnership, fostering long-term collaboration. While contract management and audits are supportive processes, delivering on commitments directly strengthens trust, as emphasized in CIPS best practices for relationship management.

In the scenario, to exchange cost cutting, the purchasing manager promises to 'reward' supplier shorter payment period. This is an example of reward power, which results from one person's ability to

compensate or reward another for compliance.

The reward does not need to be money, but could be introduction to other buyers in the group, positive references, agreement to trial new product, quicker payment or indeed any other variable that the buyer

knows is attractive and valued by the supplier.

Integrative negotiation requires shared motivation to collaborate and focus on joint benefits. When parties are motivated to work together, they can share data, explore tradeables, and align on long-term value creation. Conversely, lack of trust, unwillingness to share, or absence of joint goals make integrative approaches unworkable, forcing adversarial or distributive methods instead. CIPS highlights that motivation and willingness to cooperate are preconditions for collaboration.

Monopolies exist in many markets in real life for very different reasons:

Ownership of a Key Resource: When one company exerts sole control over a resource that is necessary for the production of a specific product, the market may become a monopoly. For example, the only medication deemed acceptable to treat a disease comes from a particular ingredient X, and knowledge of this ingredient X is owned by a single family owned company. The company can, therefore, be said to have a monopoly over ingredient X that is needed to cure the disease because it is the only company that can produce a product deemed acceptable.

Government Franchise: In certain instances, a monopoly may be explicitly created by the government if it grants a single company, whether private or government-owned, the right to conduct business in a particular market. For example, when a national railways transportation service is created by the government, in most cases they are granted a monopoly on the operation of passenger trains in the country. As a result, other firms are only able to offer passenger train services with the cooperation and/or permission of the government-owned provider.

Intellectual Property Protection: Extending intellectual property protection to a company in the form of patents and copyrights is yet another way in which monopolies are created. When a government does this, it is in fact giving a single company an exclusive right to provide a particular product / service to the market. Patents and copyrights work in providing owners of intellectual property with the right to act as an exclusive provider of a new product for a specific length of time. This creates a temporary monopoly in the market with regards to new products and services.

Natural Monopoly: A market may also become a monopoly simply because it may be more cost-effective for one company to serve the whole market than to have several smaller firms in competition with one another. A company with virtually unlimited economies of scale is referred to as a natural monopoly. Such firms become monopolies due to their position and size, which makes it impossible for new entrants in the market to compete price-wise. Natural monopolies are common in industries with high fixed costs and low marginal costs of operation such as providers of television, telephone, and internet services.

In this question, 'A single firm is very large' is not enough to tell whether this market is monopolistic.

A useful and simple shorthand for preferred negotiation styles is summarised by four simple descriptor: 'warm', 'tough', 'logical' and 'dealer', which can be applied to describe individuals' dominant preferred style in most circumstances.

Warm - a people person

Tough - a hard-nosed negotiator

Logic - a numbers person

Dealer - a trader who loves bargaining

Strengths, weaknesses of dealer style are described below:

LO 2, AC 2.4

Conflicts arise in procurement when risks, costs, or gains are not fairly shared, creating perceptions of exploitation. Another frequent source is late payment of supplier invoices, which damages trust and supplier cash flow. Scheduling or early involvement, by contrast, usually supports collaboration unless poorly managed. Conflict is natural in negotiations due to divergent interests, but recognising sources allows proactive management. Skilled negotiators use integrative approaches to turn potential conflict into opportunity, aligning incentives and ensuring fairness.

A negotiation performance review should focus on measuring outcomes against objectives, lessons learned, and evaluation of negotiator effectiveness. This ensures continual improvement and supports organisational learning. Pricing structures and alternative suppliers may have been reviewed earlier, but are not part of post-performance reflection. Travel expenses are irrelevant to negotiation learning. By focusing on objectives, learning, and performance, organisations embed best practice and prepare stronger strategies for future negotiations.

Direct costs are attributable to a specific project — in construction, this includes materials and on-site labour. Legal fees, insurance, and office space are indirect costs, as they support the business overall but are not tied to one project. For buyers, distinguishing direct from indirect costs ensures pricing transparency and helps challenge excessive overhead allocations. This knowledge strengthens cost breakdown negotiations in project contracts.

Absorption costing allocates indirect overheads to units, which is inherently judgemental; selecting allocation bases that “fairly” load overhead to products is the well-known difficulty. (By contrast, option B describes activity-based costing concepts—cost pools and drivers.)

Understanding where and with whom your supplier spends their money, or understanding the 'cost breakdowns' or 'price build-up' of the goods and services you purchase from the supplier, will help you know

where and when they can offer price concessions.

Cost information can be expressed with more impact through graphs that can be created using Excel and PowerPoint or other softwares. There are two commonly used models known as 'spend waterfall'

and 'spend tree'. Spend waterfall shows the build-up of costs, while the spend tree shows all the spends that an organisation makes.

There is no graph known as 'spend candlesticks'. Candlestick chart is a style of financial chart used to describe price movements of a security, derivative, or currency.

The aggregate expenditure model is a method of calculating GDP. The aggregate expenditure model focuses on the relationships between production (GDP) and planned spending: GDP = planned

spending = consumption + investment + government purchases + net exports.

To improve negotiation outcomes, seeking feedback from the supplier (1) and undertaking reflective practice (4) are recommended actions. Feedback from the supplier can provide insights into areas for improvement from the counterparty's perspective, while reflective practice allows the negotiator to evaluate their own approach, outcomes, and areas for growth. This approach aligns with CIPS's emphasis on continuous improvement in negotiation skills.

Integrative negotiation is a negotiation strategy in which the involved parties work together to find a solution that satisfies the needs and concerns of each. This process often involves group brainstorming and creative thinking for individuals to suggest different ideas that benefit both parties.

Compromising is often common in integrative negotiation, and both sides may need to give up certain needs to reach a solution. Honesty can also promote successful integrative negotiation because it can lead to a comprehensive understanding of the issue and what each party needs to be satisfied with the result.

If interest rate are too low and credit is too, cheap rates can fund a spending boom with consumers and businesses buying (investment) more than they can afford to pay back.

Direct costs are those costs of a product/service directly attributable/traceable to its production. Examples of direct costs including the following:

Materials and services bought-in: In steel manufacturer, raw materials are iron ores, scrap metal, coals, etc

Labour or wages: money paid to staff for the work involved in producing the product.

Other expenses: other charges incurred that can be specifically attributed to a particular product, batch or service

In the MIL framework, “Must have” refers to non-negotiable elements. For Colin’s organisation,ethical and sustainable procurementis a core, uncompromisable value, making it a “Must have” in negotiations.

According to Paul Steele's 'The Seller's Perspective', customer can be classified into 4 categories as below:

In this scenario, although SBL's spend claims large portion in suppliers' revenues, their draconian treatment will reduce SBL's attractiveness in supplier's perspective. SBL falls into Exploit quadrant. With exploitable customers, suppliers tend to 'milk' the customer and charge a high price to compensate for all the pain customer put on them.

Professional buyers, when planning or engaging in negotiation with suppliers, should always be aware of where the intended and actual relationship with this supplier is positioned on the 'spectrum' or 'continuum' of commercial relationships. The relationship spectrum describes the range of commercial relationships between a buyer and supplier based on richness of communication, longevity and mutual dependence.

Timeline Description automatically generated

In the question, the contract is simple one-off (or spot buy), which means the relationship will likely to be more transactional. In such relationship, price is the most important criteria and buyer may adopt arm's-length approach.

A push approach typically involves exerting authority or power (1) with the party being influenced generally aware of the influence process (3). This method involves overtly directing or persuading the other party, often through explicit information or directives, as per CIPS’s understanding of push influence techniques.

Competing is assertive and uncooperative, a power-oriented mode. When competing, an individual pursues his or her own concerns at the other person’s expense, using whatever power seems appropriate to win his or her position. Competing might mean standing up for your rights, defending a position you believe is correct, or simply trying to win. Competing will not allow long-term relationship to flourish.

Compromising is intermediate in both assertiveness and cooperativeness. When compromising, the objective is to find an expedient, mutually acceptable solution that partially satisfies both parties. Compromising falls on a middle ground between competing and accommodating, giving up more than competing but less than accommodating. Likewise, it addresses an issue more directly than avoiding but doesn’t explore it in as much depth as collaborating. Compromising might mean splitting the difference, exchanging concessions, or seeking a quick middle-ground position. It is a valid approach when long-term relationships are at stake and it is important to find some common ground on which to base an agreement. Both sides get something but not everything. Therefore, this is the most appropriate for this scenario.

Avoiding is unassertive and uncooperative. When avoiding, an individual does not immediately pursue his or her own concerns or those of the other person. He or she does not address the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time, or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation. In the scenario, both parties want to take the opportunity, then avoiding is not an appropriate solution.

Accommodating is unassertive and cooperative—the opposite of competing. When accommodating, an individual neglects his or her own concerns to satisfy the concerns of the other person; there is an element of self-sacrifice in this mode. Accommodating might take theform of selfless generosity or charity, obeying another person’s order when you would prefer not to, or yielding to another’s point of view. In the scenario, neither party shall concede all of their requirements, it is unnecessary to adopt this approach.

LO 1, AC 1.1

Asking questions the right way is both an art and a science. Ask the question the wrong way, and the other negotiator might act like a turtle, becoming defensive and withdrawing into their shell. Ask the question the right way, and the other negotiator might “spill the beans.”.

Closed Questions: How and when to use them?

Closed questions are those that require a short and focused answer, and are especially helpful in the beginning stages of the negotiation to encourage interaction. They can be used to clarify a point, or to reconfirm certain facts. For example, you can use a closed question to confirm the amount of units the company can produce in a week, or to clarify that what they are really saying is that they don’t feel comfortable outsourcing their accounts to India. Most closed questions only require a simple “yes” or “no” response, so there really isn’t much room for misinterpretation – great for finding out where both you and they stand.

Distributive negotiation is often described as a "win-lose" approach, where each party aims to maximize their own gain, often at the expense of the other. The focus is onachieving personal success, not collaboration.

The bargaining power of buyers increases when the buyer is large relative to the supplier. A large buyer can leverage its size to negotiate more favorable terms due to its significant impact on the supplier's business. CIPS notes that a buyer’s size and purchasing volume are key factors that enhance its negotiating power in buyer-supplier relationships.

From a principled point of view, the focus of negotiation is on resolving the issue and not on winning temporary advantage over TOP through exploiting home advantage. From the principled point of view, the location and room layout should not be viewed as a source of tactical advantage and should not be used to try to gain advantage over TOP or unfairly influence them in the meeting room.

From a pragmatic point of view, not all of these elements in the ideal negotiation environment may be feasible, so the host may have to make compromises and explain these to TOP.

From a distributive point of view, the host will seek to create an advantage for themselves either explicitly or more subtly. It is arguable that any advantage gained through intentionally creating an uncomfortable environment to put short-term pressure on TOP is likely to be short-lived as TOP will likely reflect on this later and seek means to get even.

LO 2, AC 2.4

Having a BATNA:

Increases assertiveness (A): Knowing the fallback position empowers the buyer to negotiate more confidently.

Reduces the chance of a poor agreement (B): A BATNA ensures the buyer does not feel pressured to accept suboptimal terms.

Identifies walk-away points (F): It sets a clear boundary, allowing the buyer to exit negotiations if terms don’t meet minimum requirements.

These align with CIPS’s guidance on using BATNA to strengthen negotiation strategies.

As a negotiation nears theclosure stage, experienced negotiators look forbuying signals— both verbal (e.g., positive affirmations) and non-verbal (e.g., nodding, leaning in). These cues indicate readiness to agree and allow the negotiator to move confidently into closing the deal.

“At the closing stage, negotiators should observe both verbal and non-verbal buying signals. These cues can indicate readiness to commit, helping to time the final proposal or acceptance effectively.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.2 - Closing the Negotiation)

Break-even analysis identifies the sales volume required to cover fixed costs. It relies on:

Fixed costs (constant regardless of output).

Summarising what has been said is a key component of active listening, as it demonstrates understanding and engagement in the conversation. Active listening involves confirming and clarifying information, which helps build rapport and ensures accurate communication, as outlined in CIPS’s guidelines for effective negotiation communication.

The testing stage of the negotiation cycle is where each party explores and validates information provided by the other side. By asking the supplier to present their performance to date, Ben is testing claims, checking credibility, and assessing whether the supplier’s performance supports or undermines their position in the negotiation. This is distinct from preparation (which happens before the meeting), bargaining (where concessions and tradeables are exchanged), and agreement (where final terms are confirmed). CIPS highlights that testing allows negotiators to challenge assumptions, clarify evidence, and strengthen their position before moving into bargaining or closure.