A term survivorship life insurance policy is the most cost-effective fit for the Andersons' objective. They are a young working couple with children and want to increase estate value and reduce the tax burden at death for the benefit of the children. Survivorship coverage pays on the second death, which is when final estate transfer costs and taxes commonly become due for the next generation. Term coverage keeps the premium lower during the working years compared with permanent insurance. Naming the estate as beneficiary of registered plans can increase probate exposure and does not reduce tax. Permanent individual policies may be useful for lifetime estate liquidity, but they are usually more expensive than required for a cost-sensitive young family. A joint savings account does not create immediate estate liquidity if both parents die early. Study Guide focus: survivorship insurance, estate liquidity, family protection, term insurance, and cost-effective risk management. The policy should be coordinated with wills, guardianship arrangements, registered plan beneficiaries, and expected final tax exposure.

===============

The risk event is the first death, because the surviving spouse would immediately face the mortgage obligation with reduced household capacity. A joint first-to-die term policy pays when the first insured spouse dies, and a 15-year term aligns the coverage period with the remaining mortgage horizon. Option A pays only after both spouses have died, which is too late to protect the survivor. Option C has the same timing problem and adds permanent-insurance cost for a temporary mortgage need. Option D is unrelated; annuities provide income, not death-benefit protection for a mortgage. The planner should also consider whether separate term policies would offer more flexibility, whether the coverage amount should be level or decreasing, and whether the policy should be personally owned rather than lender-owned creditor insurance. The central course principle is matching insurance type, term, amount, and ownership to the specific risk being transferred. References/topics: first-to-die insurance, term life, mortgage liability, survivor protection.

===============

Past investment experience is qualitative data because it describes behaviour, comfort, and decision history rather than a numeric financial measure. Maya should ask what products the client has owned, how the client reacted to market losses, whether prior advice was understood, and whether past decisions were self-directed or advisor-led. Annual earnings and net worth are quantitative measures used to assess capacity, savings ability, and suitability, but they do not reveal the client's behavioural tolerance for volatility. Stock option plan details are also quantitative and employment-compensation related. In AFP discovery , risk tolerance is built from both subjective and objective evidence: qualitative attitudes and experience are combined with financial capacity, time horizon, and liquidity needs. The answer is therefore past investment experiences because it provides direct insight into how the client may respond to risk. Study Guide focus: discovery, qualitative data, investment experience, KYC, and risk profiling. A client who has never experienced a major decline may overstate tolerance during a calm market.

===============