dbt Labs dbt-Analytics-Engineering Dumps

The purpose of this question is to determine how to validate that the input values in the state column support the business logic that determines the is_active field. Since the logic checks whether state = 'Active', it is critical that the state column only contains values that the business process expects. In the example shown, acceptable states appear to be: 'active', 'churned', and 'trial'.

The correct way to enforce this expectation is to apply an accepted_values test on the state column. This ensures that any unexpected state (e.g., 'inactive', 'pending', 'deleted', or NULL) will cause the test to fail, alerting the team that the upstream system is producing unexpected or invalid values. Additionally, adding not_null ensures every user record contains a valid state.

Option A is the only configuration that applies the accepted values test to the correct column (state) and reflects the expected domain of values.

Options B and D incorrectly apply tests to the derived column is_active, not the source column that needs validation. Option C only checks nullability and uniqueness, which does not validate the range of allowed values and thus does not protect the business logic.

Therefore, Option A is the only correct answer.

In dbt, source freshness can be defined at the source level (affecting all tables) or overridden at the individual table level. When freshness is declared at the source root, dbt applies the freshness policy to every table within that source unless a specific table opts out. The official dbt documentation states that setting:

freshness: null

at the table level disables freshness checks for that specific table, even when the source itself defines default freshness rules. This is the only documented way to exclude an individual table from a source freshness policy.

Option B is incorrect because tables can override and disable freshness even when the parent source defines it. dbt’s configuration hierarchy supports overriding child-level settings on a per-resource basis.

Option C (loaded_at_field: null) does not disable freshness—it simply removes the loaded_at_field, which would cause dbt to error because a freshness check requires a timestamp field to operate.

Option D (error_after: null) only removes the error threshold but does not disable freshness. The table would still participate in freshness checks and could trigger warnings.

Thus, the correct and dbt-supported method to exclude a table from freshness is to explicitly set:

freshness: null

making A the correct answer.

The correct answer is D: Declare the external table as a source using the external configuration.

When data arrives in an external storage system such as S3, many warehouses (like Snowflake, BigQuery, and Databricks) support external tables that reference data stored outside the warehouse. dbt fully supports external tables by allowing them to be declared as sources using the external: configuration block inside sources: in a YAML file. This tells dbt that the upstream object exists outside the warehouse and should not be materialized or transformed by dbt directly. It also enables dbt to include external data in lineage graphs, freshness checks, and downstream model dependencies.

Option A is not ideal because you still need to formally register the external table as a source; simply querying it in a model breaks the data lineage structure. Option B is unnecessary and operationally brittle—temporary tables are not required for external data ingestion. Option C is incorrect because dbt seed is intended for uploading local static CSV files, not files arriving via S3 or controlled by external vendors. Seeds do not support dynamic ingestion patterns.

Thus, the correct and documented method is to declare the external table as a source with the external configuration, allowing dbt to consume the data appropriately while maintaining proper governance and lineage.