The claim introduces a major fact of statement that elucidates that the financial support of the government should be concentrated towards the cities and the reason explains a statement that the importance of doing so is for the well fare and the well being in protecting the cultural and the traditional values of the nation.

It is extremely crucial that the traditional and the cultural values of the nation are protected as they create an identity for the individual and also the nation as the whole. But the statement that the cities are the only representation of the cultural and tradition is flawed. I believe that the cultural and the traditional variations and the facts that are ought to be preserved needs to be focused on the towns and the villages also as they contain the roots of the nation. City on the other hand does hold significant buildings, monuments and the historically significant structures that ought to be protected for the safeguarding of the cultural and the traditional importance of the nation.

It is also important for the nation as a whole to protect the facts especially monuments and historical structures that reflect the traditional aspects and the cultural values of the nation. Government funding plays a key role in the establishment of the same as the financial aspects are crucial in protecting the nature of the tradition and culture.

It is also important that the villages. cultural groups and minorities and the linguistic oriented cultural groups are protected and funds should be allocated for the well being and the development of the same. It is essential that the government funds that are allocated must be carefully spent on the factors that influence the cultural and traditional aspects of the nation.

For example, money should be allocated in order to teach, propagate and the spread the local and vernacular languages. Many European countries have been actively doing the same, for over a period of time.

It is also essential for the people as the tradition and culture creates a form of identity for them and the protection of the cultural and the traditional values and aspects strengthens their identity among the world nations.

The memo discusses in detail about the statement s made in order to suppose a suggestion that might get more profits for the firm. It is essential that the statements need to be supported by proper data and facts. The given statement is unsupported and is built upon a basic premise of an expected possibility in the future. The memo states that a change in the manner or pattern in which the house is built will probably be helpful for the company to improve its nature and also profit.

The company believes that they would be able to improve the profit by replacing the dining room space with more space for living room and kitchen, they also focus on state of the art kitchen facilities. It is impertaive that the company states the various assumptions and the basis on which these assumptions would be stated. The company has failed to show and prove any given data or fact that ought of lead to the evidence that there might be possible increase in the profits.

The preferential choices of the people have also not been stated any where in the

passage. The random generalization only weaknes and undermiens the statement.

the statement has to be supported with survey from the people or the purchasers

which might provide better insights to the given statements.

It is essential for the company to consider the other factors and look into the sales for

the holistic perpoective rather that from a profit oriented angle.

The type of assumptions made in the memo are subjective and inclined towards a

great extent. which might be flawed in the event of not proving any Isubslantial

evidences.

To conclude. I think that it is essential for the company to substantiate the views and assumptions with better data and facts, failing which it would remain to be flawed. Any assumptions needs to be places on valid and reasonable ideas without which the core of the premise would hold no good.

The given letter describes in detail the recommendation of the owner of a skate shop in the central plaza.The letter mentions that the city council had prohibited and imposed restrcitions on the usage of skateboard in the central plaza.though the argument in the letter deems to be possible, there are various illsutration and dearth of facts that makes the arguement placed in the letter to be weak and it is also subject lo be undermined.

Firstly, the number of other factors have not been considered or taken into account. there must be simple and logical solution stated for the menace stated by the authorities. The owner has not stated or even refuted the argument of the council which makes the argument to be flawed. The other fcators have to be questioned and the reasons on how to stop them in future need to be introspected.

Secondly, comparative statement about the other park has been stated in an ambiguous manner and the owner has failed to mention clear and concrete illustrations, paradigm question needs to be. if both the parks are of the same kind and the same nature. They should also be in a position to answer the question pertaning to the prohibitive mechanism and also the differences between the parks. I would also like to question if both the plazas follow the same protocol and litter control norms.

Thirdly, failed to mention on how the the factor of lilting the band and restriction would be advantageous for the general public and the city council. This argument is also not supported . There might be several other reasons except the prohibition that causes only a small increase in the number of clientele. For instance, the local population.;! better plaza nearby.